Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi secara menyeluruh peran informasi akuntansi dalam pengambilan keputusan investor, dengan fokus pada relevansi laba dalam konteks pasar modal. Studi ini menyoroti dinamika perilaku investor modern dan perubahan lanskap pelaporan keuangan akibat perkembangan teknologi dan standar akuntansi global.


Desain Penelitian dan Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) berdasarkan pedoman PRISMA. Sebanyak 20 artikel ilmiah bereputasi dari jurnal Q1 dan Q2, berbahasa Inggris, yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2013 hingga 2025, dianalisis untuk mengidentifikasi pola temuan, tren metodologis, serta kesenjangan penelitian mengenai informasi akuntansi dan keputusan investasi.


Hasil dan Pembahasan: Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa laba tetap menjadi indikator utama dalam menilai nilai perusahaan. Namun, relevansi laba dipengaruhi oleh faktor psikologis investor, adopsi IFRS, dan kemajuan teknologi informasi. Digitalisasi sistem informasi akuntansi meningkatkan kualitas dan ketepatan waktu data, memperkuat kegunaan informasi bagi investor. Pendekatan lintas-disiplin menjadi kunci untuk memahami keterkaitan antara akuntansi, perilaku pasar, dan teknologi.


Implikasi: Penelitian ini mendorong penguatan regulasi pelaporan keuangan, peningkatan literasi investor, dan pemanfaatan teknologi untuk transparansi dan efisiensi pelaporan. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi konseptual dan praktis bagi pengambil kebijakan, akademisi, dan pelaku pasar dalam menciptakan ekosistem investasi yang responsif dan berbasis data.

Keywords

pasar modal perlindungan investor perilaku keuangan perilaku investor keputusan investasi

Article Details

How to Cite
Hanif AR, M. A., Sofyan, D. R. R., Indrijawati, A., & Ferdiansah, M. I. (2025). Peran Informasi Akuntansi dalam Pasar Modal: Tinjauan Sistematis Literatur tentang Pengambilan Keputusan Investor dan Relevansi Laba. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 8(2), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v8i2.1481

References

  1. Ahmad, H. (2023). Several Factors Affecting Interest in Investing in the Capital Market. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 1(1 SE-Articles), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v1i1.2
  2. Alibraheem, M. H. M., Siam, I. M., Al-Daoud, K., Alkhazaali, A. R. M. K., Freihat, B. M. M., Ahmad, A. Y. A. B., Bataineh, K. A., & Al Zoubi, M. (2024). The moderating role of internal control system on the relationship between service quality of accounting information system and customer satisfaction: a study of some selected customers from commercial banks in Jordan. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.8.015
  3. Amponsah, A. A., Adekoya, A. F., & Weyori, B. A. (2022). International Journal of Information Management Data Insights Improving the Financial Security of National Health Insurance using Cloud-Based Blockchain Technology Application. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100081
  4. Asatiani, A., Apte, U., Penttinen, E., Rönkkö, M., & Saarinen, T. (2019). Impact of accounting process characteristics on accounting outsourcing - Comparison of users and non-users of cloud-based accounting information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.06.002
  5. Bani Ahmad, A. Y. A., El-Dalahmeh, S. M., Al-Shakri, K. S., Alkhawaldeh, B. Y., & Alsmadi, L. A. (2024). The link between management accounting information systems and firm competitiveness: The mediating role of innovation capabilities. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(3), 1781–1790. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.3.004
  6. Bondt, W. F. M. De, & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact ? XL(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
  7. Donelson, D. C., & Resutek, R. J. (2015). The predictive qualities of earnings volatility and earnings uncertainty. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), 470–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9308-5
  8. Dong, J. Q., Karhade, P. P., Rai, A., & Xu, S. X. (2021). How Firms Make Information Technology Investment Decisions: Toward a Behavioral Agency Theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1870382
  9. Dong, N., Wang, F., & Zhang, J. (2021). Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts and Value Relevance in Financial Reports. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(9), 2478–2502. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1695121
  10. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Market Hypothesis: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. In The Journal of Finance (Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 383–417).
  11. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
  12. Hassan, N. C., Abdul-Rahman, A., Mohd Amin, S. I., & Ab Hamid, S. N. (2023). Investment Intention and Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053949
  13. Hutahayan, B. (2020). The mediating role of human capital and management accounting information system in the relationship between innovation strategy and internal process performance and the impact on corporate financial performance. Benchmarking, 27(4), 1289–1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2018-0034
  14. Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55(12), 2049–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010
  15. Kusumawardhani, F. K., Ratmono, D., Wibowo, S. T., Darsono, D., Widyatmoko, S., & Rokhman, N. (2024). The impact of digitalization in accounting systems on information quality, cost reduction and decision making: Evidence from SMEs. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.11.023
  16. Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The End of The Path Forward Accounting and for Investors and Managers. Wiley & Sons.
  17. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. In Journal of clinical epidemiology (Vol. 62, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
  18. Lü, Y., Zhao, B., & Zhu, N. (2024). Unveiling investors’ substitution behavior: Stock trading decisions in response to housing market dynamics. Journal of Corporate Finance, 86, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102590
  19. Luft, J., Shields, M. D., & Thomas, T. F. (2016). Additional information in accounting reports: Effects on management decisions and subjective performance evaluations under causal ambiguity. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 526–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12156
  20. Monteiro, A. P., Vale, J., Leite, E., & Lis, M. (2024). Linking quality of accounting information system and financial reporting to non-financial performance: The role women managers. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 54, 100692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100692
  21. Myšková, R., & Hájek, P. (2019). Relationship between corporate social responsibility in corporate annual reports and financial performance of the US companies. Journal of International Studies, 12(1), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-1/18
  22. Naveed, M., & Ali, S. (2020). Role of financial and non-financial information in determining individual investor investment decision : a signaling perspective. 9(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-09-2019-0168
  23. Nobes, C. W., & Stadler, C. (2015). The qualitative characteristics of financial information, and managers accounting decisions: Evidence from IFRS policy changes. Accounting and Business Research, 45(5), 572–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1044495
  24. Nofel, M., Marzouk, M., Elbardan, H., Saleh, R., & Mogahed, A. (2024). Integrating Blockchain, IoT, and XBRL in Accounting Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080372
  25. O’Sullivan, P. (2018). The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis: The Compelling Fairy Tale of Contemporary Financial Economics. International Journal of Political Economy, 47(3–4), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2018.1517462
  26. Odoemelam, N., Okafor, R. G., & Ofoegbu, N. G. (2019). Cogent Business & Management Effect of international financial reporting standard ( IFRS ) adoption on earnings value relevance of quoted Nigerian firms Effect of international financial reporting standard ( IFRS ) adoption on earnings value relevance of q. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1643520
  27. Pargmann, J., Riebenbauer, E., Flick-Holtsch, D., & Berding, F. (2023). Digitalisation in accounting: a systematic literature review of activities and implications for competences. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-023-00141-1
  28. Piartrini, P. S., Andiena, P. A., & Putri, N. (2024). The influence of Accounting Information Quality on Investment Decisions : Investor Perspective in the Capital Market. 5(1), 161–169.
  29. Poljašević, J., Vašiček, V., & Kostić, M. D. (2021). Public managers’ perception of the usefulness of accounting information in decision-making processes. Public Money and Management, 41(6), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1906534
  30. Qatawneh, A. M. (2023). The Role of Employee Empowerment in Supporting Accounting Information Systems Outcomes: A Mediated Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097155
  31. Qiu, J., Deng, X., & Liang, R. (2024). Can the enterprise intelligent transformation promote accounting information transparency? Pressure from media attention. Finance Research Letters, 66(March), 105605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105605
  32. Salvi, A., Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., Giakoumelou, A., & Raimo, N. (2021). Online information on digitalisation processes and its impact on firm value. Journal of Business Research, 124(October), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.025
  33. Saukkonen, N., Laine, T., & Suomala, P. (2018). Utilizing management accounting information for decision-making: Limitations stemming from the process structure and the actors involved. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 15(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2017-0007
  34. Seok, J., Kim, Y., & Oh, Y. K. (2024). How ESG shapes firm value: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123714
  35. Shi, W. (2021). Analyzing enterprise asset structure and profitability using cloud computing and strategic management accounting. PloS One, 16(9), e0257826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257826
  36. Siladjaja, M., Anwar, Y., & Djan, I. (2022). The Relationship between Dividend Policy and Earnings Quality: The Role of Accounting Information in Indonesia’s Capital Market. Economies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10060140
  37. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  38. Song, S., Tian, F., & Li, H. (2021). Journal of Asian Economics An intraday-return-based Value-at-Risk model driven by dynamic conditional score with censored generalized Pareto distribution. Journal of Asian Economics, 74, 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101314
  39. Sonjaya, Y., & Prasetianingrum, S. (2024). Harnessing the Power of Digitalization and Accounting Information Systems for Enhanced Efficiency and Accuracy. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 2(3 SE-Articles), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v2i3.174
  40. Vardon, M., Castaneda, J. P., Nagy, M., & Schanau, S. (2018). How the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting can improve environmental information systems and data quality for decision making. Environmental Science and Policy, 89(May), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.007
  41. Völker, M., Siegert, S., & Weske, M. (2021). Adding Decision Management to Robotic Process Automation (pp. 23–37). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85867-4_3
  42. Watson, R. T., & Webster, J. (2020). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(3), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591
  43. Yang, J., Ying, L., & Xu, X. (2024). Digital transformation and accounting information comparability. Finance Research Letters, 61, 104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104993
  44. Yoshikuni, A. C., Dwivedi, R., Dultra-de-Lima, R. G., Parisi, C., & Oyadomari, J. C. T. (2023). Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American Firms. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00334-9
  45. Zhong, Q., & Fan, K. (2024). Intelligent algorithm-based analysis of corporate financial decisions in the era of cloud accounting. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00217
  46. Zhou, Y. wu, Fu, Y. shen, & Wu, X. (2023). Value analysis with blockchain-based information transparency system to eliminate information distortion. International Journal of Production Economics, 265(July), 109008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109008