Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 338 Download : 264

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and examine the effect on audit judgment of self-efficacy, obedience pressure, and moral reasoning. The purpose of this study is to analyze and examine the relationship between self-efficacy and obedience pressure using audit judgment as a moderator. The study population consisted of auditors employed by BPK RI Representatives in South Sulawesi Province who had audited local government financial reports for a period of more than five years. The total population is 52 auditors, and because the population is less than 100, the sample is determined using the census method. We gathered data for this study by sending questionnaires to all respondents. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) method was used to analyze the data. The findings indicated that self-efficacy, obedience, and moral reasoning all influenced audit judgment positively and significantly. Additionally, moral reasoning is incapable of moderating the relationship between self-efficacy and audit judgment; similarly, the moral sense is incapable of moderating the relationship between compliance pressure and audit judgment.

Keywords

Audit Judgement Moral Reasoning Obedience Pressure Self-Eficacy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rustan, R. (2021). Several Factors Affecting Audit Judgment with Moral Reasoning Moderation. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v4i1.169
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anwar, A. (2017). Pengaruh Moral Reasoning Auditor Terhadap Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor Pada Kantor BPK RI Perwakilan Propinsi Sulawesi Barat. Al-Buhuts, 13(01), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.30603/ab.v13i01.429
  2. Cohen, S., & Leventis, S. (2013, March). Effects of municipal, auditing and political factors on audit delay. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 40-53). No longer published by Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.04.002
  3. Elvira, R. D., Putra, W. E., & Susfayetti. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment (Studi Pada Auditor Bpk Ri Perwakilan Provinsi Jambi). Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.26460/ja.v7i2.970
  4. Gaffikin, M., & Lindawati, A. S. L. (2012). The moral reasoning of public accountants in the development of a code of ethics: the case of Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 6(1), 3-28. : https://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol6/iss1/10
  5. Haron, H., Ismail, I., & Na, A. L. (2015). The effect of moral reasoning, exposure to ethics and perceived ethical climate on ethical judgement of auditors in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 8(2), 25-66. https://ajba.um.edu.my/article/view/2713
  6. Kisnawati, B., & Kartini, E. Dilema Auditor Pada Sektor Pemerintah Dalam Mewujudkan Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris pada Auditor Pemerintah di Inspektorat Kabupaten Lombok Tengah dan Kabupaten Lombok Utara). Jurnal Valid, 11 (1), 1 – 15.
  7. Landarica, B. A. (2020). Pengaruh Independensi, Moral Reasoning dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Coopetition: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v11i1.72
  8. Limen, M. M. P., Karamoy, H., & Gamaliel, H. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment pada Auditor. Going Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.12.2.17547.2017
  9. Maryani, W., & Ilyas, F. (2017). Pengaruh Skeptisme, Pengalaman Auditor Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Empiris pada Auditor Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Perwakilan Provinsi Bengkulu). Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(3), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.7.3.35-52
  10. Muslim, M., Pelu, M. F. A., & Mentari, K. S. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi Auditor, Tekanan Ketaatan, dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judgment. Bongaya Journal for Research in Accounting (BJRA), 1(2), 08-17. https://doi.org/10.37888/bjra.v1i2.78
  11. Muslim, M., Ahmad, H., Rahim, S., & ARPelu, M. F. (2020). Client Pressures, Audit Tenure to Audit Quality: Moderation of Auditor Independence. Journal Of Auditing, Finance, And Forensic Accounting, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v8i2.8349
  12. Muttiwijaya, G. T., & Ariyanto, D. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Skeptisisme Profesional, Independensi, dan Kompleksitas TugasTerhadap Audit Judgment. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 27(2), 1290-1315. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2019.v27.i02.p17
  13. Naibaho, E. R., Hardi, & Hanif, R. A. (2014). Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi, Moral Reasoning dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (studi empiris pada BPK RI perwakilan provinsi Riau). JOM FEKON, 1(2), 1-15.
  14. Parwatha, I. P. A., Edy Sujana, S. E., & Purnamawati, I. G. A. (2017). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, Dan Pengalaman Kerja Terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Provinsi Bali). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 8(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v8i2.12265
  15. Pertiwi, K. U. C., & Budiartha, K. (2017). Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, independensi, pengalaman kerja, locus of control terhadap audit judgment di KAP Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(1), 712-740. https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/28124
  16. Putra, A. M. T., & Rani, P. (2016). Pengaruh Gender, Kompleksitas Tugas, Pengalaman Auditor dan Kompetensi Profesional Terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Wilayah DKI Jakarta dan Tangerang Periode 2016). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(2), 80-100.
  17. Putri, A. U. (2018). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Auditor Judgement (Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Palembang). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 9(2), 95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.35908/jiegmk.v9i2.537
  18. Rahayuningsih, E. R., & Widhiyani, N. S. (2019). Moral Reasoning dan Skeptisisme Profesional Memoderasi Pengaruh Independensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi, 29(3), 972-986. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2019.v29.i03.p05.
  19. Rahim, S., Muslim, M., & Amin, A. (2019). Red Flag and Auditor Experience Toward Criminal Detection Trough Profesional Skepticism. Jurnal Akuntansi, 23(1), 47-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/ja.v23i1.459
  20. Rahim, S., Ahmad, H., Muslim, M., & Nursadirah, A. (2020). Disclosure of Local Government Financial Statements in South Sulawesi. In Brawijaya International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences and Technology (BICMST 2020) (pp. 1-6). Atlantis Press.
  21. Satiman, S. (2018). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Tekanan Ketaatan, Locus of Control, Dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judjement. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v6i1.1201
  22. Shanti, Y. K. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgement Dengan Senioritas Auditor Sebagai Pemoderasi (Studi Kasus pada Inspektorat Kota Bogor dan Depok). JURNAL AKUNTANSI BARELANG, 3(2), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.33884/jab.v3i2.1237
  23. Sholehah, N. L., Rahim, S., & Muslim, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Moralitas Individu dan Personal Culture Terhadap Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 1(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v1i1.62
  24. Sofiani, M. M. O. L. (2014). Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, pengalaman audit, dan audit tenure terhadap audit judgement. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(1), 270.
  25. Suardikha, I. M. S., & Budiartha, K. (2017). Kemampuan Gender Memoderasi Pengaruh Self-Efficacy Dan Kompleksitas Tugas Pada Audit Judgment. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pariwisata, 12(2).
  26. Surya, L. P. L. S., & Dewi, C. I. R. S. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan Pada Audit Judgment Dengan Religiusitas Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 29(2), 673-682. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2019.v29.i02.p14
  27. Syamsuriana, N., Nasaruddin, F., Suun, M., & Ahmad, H. (2019). Dampak Perilaku Altruisme, Moral Reasoning dan Kecerdasan Emosional Terhadap Kualitas Audit. ATESTASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 2(2), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v2i2.275
  28. Tampubolon, L. (2018). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Pengetahuan, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment. InFestasi, 14(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v14i2.4870
  29. Tumurang, D. O., Ilat, V., & Kalalo, M. Y. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Audit Judgment Auditor Pada Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v7i3.24906
  30. Wedhasari, I. P., & Astika, I. P. (2018). Moral Reasoning Memoderasi Pengaruh Ethical SensitivityPada Kualitas Internal Audit di PT. Bank BRIKantor Cabang Se-Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 25(1), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2018.v25.i01.p07
  31. Wijayantini, K. A. S., Yuniarta, G. A., AK, S., Atmadja, A. T., & SE, A. (2014). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, Dan Self-Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v2i1.2980
  32. Yendrawati, R., & Mukti, D. K. (2015). Pengaruh gender, pengalaman auditor, kompleksitas tugas, tekanan ketaatan, kemampuan kerja dan pengetahuan auditor terhadap audit judgement. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 4(01), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol4.iss1.art1
  33. Yowanda , V., Kristina, V., Pernando, R., Sherly, S., Erika, E., Sitepu, W. R., et al. (2019). Pengaruh Skeptisme, Pengalaman Auditor, dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Audit Judgement Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah ESAI, 13(2), 124-140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25181/esai.v13i2.1275