Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 1899 Download : 1511

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of management accounting information systems and control systems on managerial performance with leadership style as a moderating variable at PT. Pa'baeng-baeng branch pawnshop. The data collection technique used in this research is the survey technique by distributing questionnaires and studying documentation. The population and samples used in this study were 30 respondents. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis were processed using assistance Software SPSS26. This study indicates that the management accounting information system and control system have a positive and significant effect on managerial performance at PT. Pa'baeng-baeng branch pawnshop. These results suggest that the leadership style variable only weakens the influence of the management accounting information system and management control system on organizational performance at PT. Pa'baeng-baeng branch pawnshop. The company is expected to maintain and carry out its functions systematically so that the management accounting information system and management control system can run effectively. The company is also likely to continue improving managerial performance with variables other than the management accounting information system and control systems, such as performance measurement system variables, information technology, etc. For further researchers, this research is expected to be used as a reference to be used as material for research development by using other variables outside of this research and using more and more varied research indicators and adapted to the situation and condition of the object of study.

Keywords

Management Accounting Information System Control System Leadership Style Managerial Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Jusriadi, E. (2022). Moderation of Leadership Style: Management Accounting Information Systems and Management Control Systems on Managerial Performance. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v5i1.19
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Okaily, A., Al-Okaily, M., Shiyyab, F., & Masadah, W. (2020). Accounting Information System Effectiveness From An Organizational Perspective. Management Science Letters, 10(16), 3991-4000. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.7.010
  2. Amertadewi, T. I. M., & Dwirandra, A. (2013). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Locus Of Control Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 4(2013), 550–566. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/download/6378/4901
  3. Amir, A., Ridwan, R., Din, M., Yamin, N., Zahra, F., & Firman, M. (2021). The Role Of Budget Participation In Improving Managerial Performance. Accounting, 7(2), 269-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.12.004
  4. Arsyad, M., Haeruddin, S. H., Muslim, M., & Pelu, M. F. A. (2021). The effect of activity ratios, liquidity, and profitability on the dividend payout ratio. Indonesia Accounting Journal, 3(1), 36-44. http://doi.org/10.32400/iaj.30119
  5. Astini, N. K., Sulindawati, N. L. G. E., & Sinarwati, N. K. (2014). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Dan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial SKPD Di Kabupaten Klungkung. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v2i1.3424
  6. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The Impact Of Structure, Environment, And Interdependence On The Perceived Usefulness Of Management Accounting Systems. Accounting Review, 16–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247520
  7. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship Quality In Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective. The Journal Of Marketing, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177%2f002224299005400306
  8. Cugueró-Escofet, N., & Rosanas, J. M. (2013). The Just Design And Use Of Management Control Systems As Requirements For Goal Congruence. Management Accounting Research, 24(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.11.001
  9. Dalimunthe, A. R., Napitupulu, I. H., & Situngkir, A. (2018). The Internal Control Of Management Accounting Information Systems Of The State-Owned Enterprises In Indonesia. Archives Of Business Research, 6(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.66.4729
  10. Febrianti, R., & Fitri, Y. (2020). Pengaruh Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen, Ketidakpastian Lingkungan, Dan Desentralisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan BUMN Di Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA) 5(2), 457-458. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimeka.v5i2.15561
  11. Fiedler, F. (1958). Fiedler's Contingency Theory. Leader Attitudes And Group Effectiveness.
  12. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. Mcgraw-Hill Series In Management.
  13. Gangai, K. N., & Agrawal, R. (2019). The Linkage Between Ethical Leadership And Employee Engagement For Managerial Performance: A Critical Review. BULMIM Journal Of Management And Research, 4(1), 11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2455-3298.2019.00003.5
  14. Granero, L. M. (2019). Strategic Product Variety And Quality Choice. Economics Letters, 182, 10–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.05.033
  15. Hakim, L., Asmony, T., & Inapty, B. A. (2016). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasional, Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah, Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Survey Pada SKPD Sumbawa Dan Sumbawa Barat). Journal Of Auditing, Finance, And Forensic Accounting, 4(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v4i2.2781
  16. Hartini, E. F., & Lestari, R. P. (2020). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Dan Sistem Pengendalian Akuntansi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Prosiding Manajerial Dan Kewirausahaan, 3, 12–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.33370/prc.v3i0.439
  17. Hastuti, W. N. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen, Motivasi Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Survey Pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jambi). Akuntansi. https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/27013
  18. Heller, F. A. (2019). Leadership, Decision Making, And Contingency Theory. In Managing Democratic Organizations (Pp. 211-227). Routledge.
  19. Hidayat, Y. A., Kiranamahsa, S., & Zamal, M. A. (2019). A Study Of Plastic Waste Management Effectiveness In Indonesia Industries. AIMS Energy, 7(3), 350-370. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2019.3.350
  20. Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals Of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating And Implementing Effective Risk Management. Kogan Page Publishers.
  21. Irawati, A., & Ardianshah, R. (2018). Pengaruh Karakteristik Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Desentralisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/jak.v9i1.997
  22. Laswati, I. S. (2021). Pengaruh Proses Pengendalian Manajemen Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 1(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.29313/jra.v1i1.193
  23. Suprantiningrum, S., & Lukas, A. D. (2021). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen, Pengendalian Manajemen terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Variabel Moderating Teknologi Informasi. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(1), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i1.368
  24. Mahoney, M. J. (1987). Scientific Publication And Knowledge Politics. Journal Of Social Behavior And Personality, 2(2), 165.
  25. Mahulette, B. W., Karamoy, H., & Wangkar, A. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Dalam Usaha Meningkatkan Kinerja Manajer Produksi Pada PT. Citra Raja Ampat Canning. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v8i4.31228
  26. Napitupulu, I. H. (2018). Organizational Culture In Management Accounting Information System: Survey On State-Owned Enterprises (Soes) Indonesia. Global Business Review, 19(3), 556-571. https://doi.org/10.1177%2f0972150917713842
  27. Nasrun, M. (2018). The Effect Of TQM And Budget Participation On Managerial Performance In Corporate Manufacturing In Industrial Area Makassar. ATESTASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 1(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v1i1.48
  28. Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L., & Chong, V. K. (2017). Effect Of Transformational-Leadership Style And Management Control System On Managerial Performance. Journal Of Business Research, 70, 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.018
  29. Nur Haryono, P., & Setiawati, E. (2016). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Karangmalang Sragen. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/43791
  30. Nur Romadhani, P. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Kabupaten Sukoharjo). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Http://Eprints.Ums.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/45696
  31. Otley, D. (2016). The Contingency Theory Of Management Accounting And Control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001
  32. Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing Information Systems Knowledge: A Typology Of Literature Reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
  33. Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. R. (2013). Information Systems Success: The Quest For The Independent Variables. Journal Of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-62. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222290401
  34. Pppk.Kemenkeu.Go.Id. (2021). Infografis Laporan Pediodik PPPK Triwulan I 2020.
  35. Rumapea, M., Sinaga, J., & Saragih, R. E. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen, Metode Pengukuran Kinerja Dan Sistem Penghargaan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Rumah Sakit ESTOMIHI Medan. METHOMIKA: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 2(1), 63-73. Https://Doi.Org/10.46880/Jmika.v2i1.Pp63-73
  36. Safari, A., & Saleh, A. S. (2020). Key Determinants Of Smes’ Export Performance: A Resource-Based View And Contingency Theory Approach Using Potential Mediators. Journal Of Business & Industrial Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-11-2018-0324
  37. Seidl, A., Hartl, R. F., & Kort, P. M. (2019). A multi-stage optimal control approach of durable goods pricing and the launch of new product generations. Automatica, 106, 207-220.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2019.05.009
  38. Su, S. X., Baird, K., & Nuhu, N. (2021). Controllability Of Performance Measures And Managerial Performance: The Mediating Role Of Fairness. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-07-2020-0957
  39. Sumarsan, T. (2020). Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen: Transformasi Strategi Untuk Keunggulan Kompetitif. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta Barat: Campustaka.
  40. Sumaryati, A., Praptika Novitasari, E., & Machmuddah, Z. (2020). Accounting Information System, Internal Control System, Human Resource Competency And Quality Of Local Government Financial Statements In Indonesia. The Journal Of Asian Finance, Economics, And Business, 7(10), 795-802. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.n10.795
  41. Suprantiningrum, S., & Lukas, A. D. (2021). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen, Pengendalian Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Variabel Moderating Teknologi Informasi. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(1), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i1.368
  42. Sukma, R. (2021). Pengaruh Efektivitas Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen Dan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manjerial Pada PT. Socfindo Di Medan. Universitas Medan Area. http://repository.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/15448
  43. Sumarsan, T. (2016). Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen. Indeks.
  44. Tendean, A. B., Saerang, D. P., & Runtu, T. (2018). Pengaruh Struktur Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen, Proses Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Dan Sistem Penghargaan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Pada Rsud Sulawesi Utara). Going Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 13(03). https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.03.20776.2018
  45. Umami, R. (2020). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v7i1
  46. Wijayati, D. T., Rahman, Z., Rahman, M. F. W., Arifah, I. D. C., & Kautsar, A. (2022). A study of artificial intelligence on employee performance and work engagement: the moderating role of change leadership. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2021-0423
  47. Yuniarti, E., & Satya, F. M. (2019). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Hubungan Antara Partisipasi Anggaran Dan Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Cabang Perbankan Di Propinsi Lampung). Jurnal Ilmiah ESAI, 2(1), 40–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.25181/esai.v2i1.1312
  48. Yustien, R. (2011). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Pada Pusat Pendapatan Dan Pusat Biaya Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Rumah Sakit Umum Tipe B Di Provinsi Jawa Barat. PEKBIS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis), 4(01). https://pekbis.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JPEB/article/view/428
  49. Yusuf, M. (2018). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Self Efficacy, Desentralisasi, Budaya Organisasi Dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Kasus Pada BPR Di Magelang). Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang. http://eprintslib.ummgl.ac.id/id/eprint/432
  50. Xie, Y., Xue, W., Li, L., Wang, A., Chen, Y., Zheng, Q., ... & Li, X. (2018). Leadership Style and Innovation Atmosphere In Enterprises: An Empirical Study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.017