Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to map the academic research landscape of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) through a bibliometric analysis approach. Grounded in management accounting theory, stakeholder theory, and a sustainability perspective, it emphasizes EMA’s strategic function as a bridge between business performance and environmental accountability.


Research Design and Methodology: A quantitative bibliometric analysis was performed using data retrieved from the Scopus database with the search query “Environmental AND Management AND Accounting.” The dataset was analyzed using bibliometric and VOSviewer software to conduct descriptive analysis, co-authorship mapping, co-citation analysis, and keyword co-occurrence analysis. These methods were used to identify dominant research themes, influential authors, and the evolution of themes in EMA scholarship.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal a rapid growth in EMA publications, with research primarily clustered around three core dimensions: strategic, operational, and economic. The study also highlights that EMA has evolved from a tool for environmental cost tracking into a comprehensive management framework that enhances sustainability practices, operational efficiency, and corporate financial performance.


Implications: This study contributes by offering an updated bibliometric mapping of EMA research, providing valuable insights for both academics and practitioners. The results underscore the importance of integrating EMA into corporate sustainability strategies, particularly in the era of digital transformation and the green economy. Future studies are recommended to explore the role of digital technologies in expanding EMA’s implementation and impact.

Keywords

environmental management accounting bibliometric analysis sustainability operational efficiency thematic mapping

Article Details

How to Cite
Muliyani, D. (2025). Mapping the Research Landscape of Environmental Management Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v9i1.1940

References

  1. Alryalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2019(152). https://doi.org/10.3791/58494
  2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  3. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021). Forty Years of the Journal of Futures Markets: A bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22211
  4. Barani, O., Ahmed, A. D., Joshi, M., & Asiaei, K. (2025). How Environmental Management Accounting Drives Performance: A Meta-Analysis Considering National EMA Maturity. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 416–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-01-2025-0033
  5. Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford’s Law and the Bibliography of Science. In NATURE (Vol. 224).
  6. Burritt, R., & Christ, K. (2016). Industry 4.0 and Environmental Accounting: A New Revolution? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-016-0007-y
  7. Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Toward a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting-Links Betweet Bussiness Actors and Environmental Management Accounting Tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(27), 39–50. https://fb.com/tailieudientucntt
  8. Burritt, R. L., Herzig, C., Schaltegger, S., & Viere, T. (2019). Diffusion of Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production: Evidence from Some Case Studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.227
  9. Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: Fad or Trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080144
  10. Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2021, September 15). Putting the Focus on Environmental Management Accounting. https://www.ifac.org
  11. Busch, T., & Lewandowski, S. (2018). Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12591
  12. Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data Information and Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
  13. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The Role of Environmental Disclosures as Tools of Legitimacy: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.
  14. Christ, K. L., Rao, K. K., & Burritt, R. L. (2019). Accounting for Modern Slavery: An Analysis of Australian Listed Company Disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(3), 836–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2017-3242
  15. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and Sustainability Reporting: Economic Analysis and Literature Review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  16. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An Approach for Detecting, Quantifying, and Visualizing the Evolution of a Research Field: A Practical Application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory Field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  17. Donohue, J. C. (1972). A Bibliometric Analysis of Certain Information Science Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23(5), 313–317.
  18. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  19. Ferreira, A., Moulang, C., & Hendro, B. (2010). Environmental Management Accounting and Innovation: An Exploratory Analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 920–948.
  20. Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018). Exploring Environmental and Economic Costs and Benefits of a Circular Economy Approach to the Construction and Demolition Sector: A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 618–643.
  21. Golicic, S. L., & Smith, C. D. (2013). A Meta-Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12006
  22. Goyal, K., & Kumar, S. (2021). Financial Literacy: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. In International Journal of Consumer Studies (Vol. 45, Issue 1, pp. 80–105). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12605
  23. Gunarathnee, N., & Lee, K.-H. (2015). Environmental Management Acoounting (EMA) for Environmental Management and Organizational Change: An Eco-Control Approach. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11.
  24. Hallikas, J., Karvonen, I., Pulkkinen, U., Virolainen, V.-M., & Tuominen, M. (2004). Risk Management Processes in Supplier Networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 47–58.
  25. Handoyo, S. (2024). Green Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and Future Directions. Production and Manufacturing Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2024.2422614
  26. Herzig, C., Viere, T., Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R. L., & Ki-Hoon, L. (2012). Environmental Management Accounting: Case Studies of South-East Asian Companies. Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, 36(4), 310–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.08.001
  27. IFAC. (2005). Environmental Management Accounting: International Guidance Document. International Federation of Accountants.
  28. Jamil, C. Z. M., Mohamed, R., Muhammad, F., & Ali, A. (2015). Environmental Management Accounting Practices in Small Medium Manufacturing Firms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.411
  29. Khanh, T. H. T., Rajagopal, P., Tram, N. T. T., & Bardai, B. Bin. (2025). Environmental Management Accounting as a Mediator in the Impact of Innovations on Competitive Advantage: A Nexus Approach to the SDGs. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(2), e04405. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe04405
  30. Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2008). Determinants of the Adoption of Sustainability Assurance Statements: An International Investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.643
  31. Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of Environmental Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Top Management’s Commitment on Corporate Environmental Performance: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
  32. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An Up-To-Date Review. In Profesional de la Informacion (Vol. 29, Issue 1). El Profesional de la Informacion. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  33. Ong, J., Noordin, R., & Jaidi, J. (2020). Environmental Management Accounting in the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 13(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajap.vol13no1.5
  34. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. www.sagepublications.com
  35. Parker, L. D. (2005). Social and Environmental Accountability Research: A View from the Commentary Box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842–860.
  36. Peloza, J. (2009). The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts from Investments in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335188
  37. Posit, T. (2025, October 8). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.posit.co
  38. Qian, W., Burritt, R., & Monroe, G. (2011). Environmental Management Accounting in Local Government: A Case of Waste Management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(1), 93–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111098072
  39. Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting Carbon Disclosure and Performance: Legitimacy and Management Views. British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005
  40. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary Environmental Accounting - Issues, Concepts and Practice (1st Edition). Greenleaf Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351282529
  41. Schaltegger, S., Christ, K. L., Wenzig, J., & Burritt, R. L. (2022). Corporate Sustainability Management Accounting and Multi-Level Links for Sustainability – A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12288
  42. Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., & Zvezdov, D. (2013). Is Environmental Management Accounting a Discipline? A Bibliometric Literature Review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 21(1), 4–31.
  43. Schaltegger, S., & Zvezdov, D. (2015). Gatekeepers of sustainability information: Exploring the roles of accountants. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(3), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2013-0083
  44. Swalih, M. M., Ram, R., & Tew, E. (2024). Environmental Management Accounting for Strategic Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6335–6367. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3828
  45. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software Survey: VOSviewer, A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  46. Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG Performance Have an Impact on Financial Performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029
  47. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629