Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: environmental taxation; green taxes; carbon pricing; sustainable development; bibliometric analysis.


Research Design and Methodology: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed on 398 Scopus-indexed publications (1990–2025) using RStudio and the bibliometrix package, incorporating performance metrics, thematic evolution, co-word networks, and conceptual structure mapping.


Findings and Discussion: The results indicate a pronounced surge in scholarly output after 2015, coinciding with intensified climate policy commitments. Environmental taxation, carbon emissions, sustainable development, and environmental technology emerge as foundational themes, while motor themes illustrate an increasing convergence among fiscal instruments, innovation systems, and emissions mitigation strategies. Collaboration networks position China, the United States, and Europe as central nodes in global knowledge production.


Implications: The evidence underscores the need to design environmental tax policies that integrate fairness, transparency, and technological capability to enhance societal acceptance and policy effectiveness. Future research should broaden linguistic and geographic coverage and employ mixed-methods designs to more fully capture the institutional and behavioral dynamics that influence tax implementation.

Keywords

environmental taxation green taxes carbon pricing sustainable development bibliometric analysis

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mubarok, M. L. (2026). The Rise of Green Taxation: Global Intellectual Patterns and Emerging Research Agendas. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 9(1), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v9i1.2041
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali, K., Jianguo, D., Kirikkaleli, D., Oláh, J., & Bakhsh, S. (2023). Do environmental taxes, environmental innovation, and energy resources matter for environmental sustainability: Evidence of five sustainable economies. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21577
  2. Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
  3. Apriantoro, M. S., & Maulana, I. (2025). Environmental Taxation Through a Bibliometric Lens: Finding Leading Voices, Trends, and Gaps. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(2), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.17815
  4. Avgousti, A., Caprioli, F., Caracciolo, G., Cochard, M., Dallari, P., Delgado-Téllez, M., Domingues, J., Ferdinandusse, M., Filip, D., Nerlich, C., Prammer, D., Schmidt, K., & Theofilakou, A. (2023). The climate change challenge and fiscal instruments and policies in the EU. In ECB Occasional Paper. https://doi.org/10.2866/850581
  5. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus is a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
  6. Cary, M., & Rockwell, T. (2020). International collaboration in open access publications: How income shapes international collaboration. Publications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8010013
  7. Castellacci, F., & Lie, C. M. (2017). A taxonomy of green innovators: Empirical evidence from South Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.016
  8. Chen, C., & Song, M. (2019). Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS ONE, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994
  9. Choi, T. M., & Luo, S. (2019). Data quality challenges for sustainable fashion supply chain operations in emerging markets: Roles of blockchain, government sponsors and environment taxes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 131, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.09.019
  10. Farhan Bashir, M., Ma, B., Bilal, &, Komal, B., Muhammad, &, & Bashir, A. (2021). Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 20700–20716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12123-x/Published
  11. Ghazouani, A., Mehdi, &, Jebli, B., & Shahzad, U. (2021). Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Volume 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9/Published
  12. Goulder, L. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend A reader’s guide. National Buerau of Economic Research, 4896. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0661-0_14
  13. Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005
  14. Graci, S. (2013). Collaboration and Partnership Development for Sustainable Tourism. Tourism Geographies, 15(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2012.675513
  15. Hakam, S. L., Rahayu, A., Wibowo, L. A., Hakam, L. I., Nugroho, M. A., & Fuadi, S. S. (2024). Compliance Behavior in Environmental Tax Policy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17120542
  16. Hartono, D., Indriyani, W., Iryani, B. S., Komarulzaman, A., Nugroho, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2023). Carbon tax, energy policy, and sustainable development in Indonesia. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2332–2346. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2511
  17. Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.325
  18. He, X., Jing, Q., & Chen, H. (2023). The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118578
  19. Krass, D., Nedorezov, T., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2013). Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management, 22(5), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12023
  20. Kulin, J., & Johansson Sevä, I. (2020). Who do you trust? How trust in partial and impartial government institutions influences climate policy attitudes. Climate Policy, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1792822
  21. Li, Y., Tang, Y. T., Tan-Mullins, M., & Ives, C. D. (2023). Exploring the Potential Opportunities of China’s Environmental Agenda, Ecological Civilization, on Global Sustainable Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065135
  22. Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., Savin, I., & van den Bergh, J. (2021). Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27380-8
  23. Njivukuh, T., Kaffo, H., & Wendji, C. (2023). Green taxation and renewable energy technologies adoption: A global evidence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.01.010
  24. Nurulita, A. F., & Prasidya, T. C. I. T. (2025). Combating Climate Changes Through Fiscal Policies in Developed World: Key Insights for Indonesia from Scandinavian Green Tax Scheme. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 6(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijtc.v6i1.1613
  25. Okombi, I. F., & Ndoum Babouama, V. B.-D. (2024). Environmental taxation and inclusive green growth in developing countries: does the quality of institutions matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(21), 30633–30662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33245-6
  26. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
  27. Peter Simpa, Nko Okina Solomon, Olubunmi Adeolu Adenekan, & Scholar Chinenye Obasi. (2024). Strategic implications of carbon pricing on global environmental sustainability and economic development: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Advanced Economics, 6(5), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijae.v6i5.1134
  28. Rausch, S., & Reilly, J. (2015). Carbon Taxes, Deficits, and Energy Policy Interactions. National Tax Journal, 68(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.1.07
  29. Rokhmawati, A., Sarasi, V., & Berampu, L. T. (2024). Scenario analysis of the Indonesia carbon tax impact on carbon emissions using system dynamics modeling and STIRPAT model. Geography and Sustainability, 5(4), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2024.07.003
  30. Sharif, A., Kocak, S., Khan, H. H. A., Uzuner, G., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Demystifying the links between green technology innovation, economic growth, and environmental tax in ASEAN-6 countries: The dynamic role of green energy and green investment. Gondwana Research, 115, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.010
  31. Sheu, J. B., & Chen, Y. J. (2012). Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.024
  32. Soysal, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., & Van Der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2014). Modelling food logistics networks with emission considerations: The case of an international beef supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.012
  33. Wang, Y., & Yu, L. (2021). Can the current environmental tax rate promote green technology innovation? - Evidence from China’s resource-based industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123443
  34. Yang, S., Han, R., Wolfram, D., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.003
  35. Zhang, L., Xue, L., & Zhou, Y. (2019). How do low-carbon policies promote green diffusion among alliance-based firms in China? An evolutionary-game model of complex networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.028
  36. Zhang, Y., Xia, F., & Zhang, B. (2023). Can raising environmental tax reduce industrial water pollution? Firm-level evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 101, 107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107155
  37. Zhang, Y., Yuan, L., Ibrahim, I., & Omar, R. (2025). Sustainability in Question: Climate Risk, Environment, Social and Governance Performance, and Tax Avoidance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041400