Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 394 Download : 415

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The research objective was to compare the value of the Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC) with the Accounting Earnings Response Coefficient (AERC). Research on earnings response has been carried out with mixed results using the Earnings Response coefficient. Several researchers provide arguments and highlight the weaknesses of the ERC measure used to measure earnings quality. This study suspects that the size of the ERC may be different if cash flows are applied and not only earnings based on historical cost or accrual principles. The synthesis process is carried out to generate new concepts and then comparisons will be made of the ERC and AERC results. The study was conducted on 69 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2017. The results of the different test results for the ERC and AERC values on the Paired Sample Test value are significant (0.000), which means that the value obtained by adding CFO to the AERC equation is different from the ERC concept. These results indicate that the earnings quality resulting from the AERC regression by adding the CFO value to the AERC equation is the earnings quality after being corrected by CFO, so that the AERC value reflects the real earnings quality.

Keywords

Accounting Earnings Response Coefficient Earning Response Coefficient Operational Cash Flow Earning Quality

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Paramita, R. W. D. (2020). Accounting Earning Response Coefficient: Synthesis of Earning Responses. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 3(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v3i2.252
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. A.M. Al-Baidhani, A. Abdullah, M. Ariff, F.F. Cheng, Y. K. (2017). Review Of Earnings Response Coefficient Studies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i3c2a
  2. Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2013a). Econometrics of the basu asymmetric timeliness coefficient and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12026
  3. Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2013b). On estimating conditional conservatism. Accounting Review, 88(3), 755–787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50371
  4. Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., Robin, A., & Ny, R. (1999). The Effect of International Institutional Factors On Properties of Accounting Earnings by. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–51.
  5. Beaver, W., Lambert, R., & Morse, D. (1980). The information content of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2(1), 3–28.
  6. Cho, J. Y. dan K. J. (1991). Earnings Response Coefficients: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Jornal of Accounting Literature, 10, 85–116.
  7. Collins, D. W., & Kothari, S. P. (1989a). An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2–3), 143–181.
  8. Collins, D. W., & Kothari, S. P. (1989b). An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2–3), 143–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(89)90004-9
  9. Dechow, P. M., & Ge, W. (2006). The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: Implications for the accrual anomaly. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2–3), 253–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9004-1
  10. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
  11. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
  12. Feltham, G. A., & Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 689–731.
  13. Foster, L. T., & Jones, K. G. (1977). Applied Geography: An Educational Alternative. The Professional Geographer, 29(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1977.00300.x
  14. Hecht, P., & Vuolteenaho, T. (2006). Explaining Returns with Cash-Flow Proxies. Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 159–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj001
  15. Holthausen, R. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1988). The Effect of Sequential Information Releases on the Variance of Price Changes in an Intertemporal Multi-Asset Market. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491114
  16. Lintner, J. (1965a). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37.
  17. Lintner, J. (1965b). Security Prices, Risk, And Maximal Gains From Diversification. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb02930.x
  18. Lorek, K. S., & Willinger, G. L. (2008). Time-series properties and predictive ability of quarterly cash flows. Advances in Accounting, 24(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2008.05.010
  19. Mendenhall, W., Beaver, R. J., & Beaver, B. M. (2012). Introduction to probability and statistics. Cengage Learning.
  20. Mostafa, W., & Dixon, R. (2013). The impact of earnings extremity on information content of cash flow. Review of Accounting and Finance, 12(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757701311295845
  21. Ohlson, J. A. (1990). A Synthesis of security valuation theory and the role of dividends, cash flows, and earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 6(2), 648–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1990.tb00780.x
  22. Patatoukas, P. N. (2014). Detecting news in aggregate accounting earnings: implications for stock market valuation. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9221-3
  23. Patell, J. M., & Wolfson, M. A. (1984). The intraday speed of adjustment of stock prices to earnings and dividend announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90024-2
  24. Ray Ball, P. B. (1965). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. In Journal of Accounting Research (pp. 159–178).
  25. Sehgal, S., & Pandey, A. (2010). Equity valuation using price multiples: evidence from India. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 6(1), 89–108.
  26. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.
  27. Siegal, W., Church, A. H., Javitch, M., Waclawski, J., Burd, S., Bazigos, M., Yang, T.-F., Anderson-Rudolph, K., & Warner Burke, W. (1996). Understanding the management of change: An overview of managers’ perspectives and assumptions in the 1990s. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(6), 54–80.
  28. Teets, W. R., & Wasley, C. E. (1996). Estimating earnings response coefficients: Pooled versus firm-specific models. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(96)00423-5
  29. Treynor, J. L. (1961a). Market Value, Time, And Risk. Modern Economy, 7(2).
  30. Treynor, J. L. (1961b). Toward a Theory of Market Value of Risky Assets. Modern Economy, 6.
  31. Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207
  32. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1086/467051
  33. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156.
  34. Whitley, R. D. (1988). The possibility and utility of positive accounting theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90037-2