Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 645 Download : 387

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of investigative audits and the implementation of a whistleblowing system on fraud prevention. The data collection method is done by sending a research questionnaire contained in the google form link. The population in this study was 90 auditors at the Deputy for Investigation at the Central Office of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta. The sampling technique uses saturated samples so that the total sample is 90 auditors. This research method uses descriptive statistics, which are processed with the help of PLS. The study results found that the investigative audit has no significant effect on fraud prevention while implementing the Whistleblowing System significantly impacts fraud prevention. The investigative audit cannot prevent the possibility of abuse early on. This is because investigative audits are conducted after indications of abuse are found or a systematic investigation of evidence is ongoing. Investigative audits conducted by auditors at BPKP DKI Jakarta can now be reactive, meaning that the auditors conduct audits after receiving or obtaining information from other parties regarding the possibility of fraud and fraud crime. Implementing a sound whistleblowing system must also have a whistleblower protection policy. This policy was formed to avoid detrimental actions to the whistleblower so that the whistleblower will feel that his security is maintained.

Keywords

Audit Investigation Fraud Prevention Whistleblowing System

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Achyarsyah, P. (2022). Can investigative audit and whistleblowing systems prevent fraud?. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v5i1.31
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anandya, C. R., & Werastuti, D. N. S. (2020). Pengaruh Whistleblowing System, Budaya Organisasi Dan Moralitas Individu Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Pada Pt. Pelabuhan Indonesia Iii (Persero) Benoa Bali. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 10(2), 185–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v10i2.25933
  2. Aresteria, M. (2018). Peran Audit Internal Dalam Pencegahan Fraud Di Perguruan Tinggi: Literature Review. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 6(1), 45–53. https://103.209.1.42/index.php/JAEMB/article/view/810
  3. Batubara, E. D. (2020). Penerapan Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigatif Terhadap Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud): Penerapan Akuntansi Forensik Dan Audit Investigatif Terhadap Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud). Juripol (Jurnal Institusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan), 3(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v3i2.10776
  4. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money; A Study of The Social Psychology of Embezzlement.
  5. Cressey, D. R. (1955). Changing Criminals: The Application of The Theory of Differential Association. American Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 116–120. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/221691
  6. Crowe, H. (2011). Putting The Freud In Fraud: Why The Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough. In Howart, Crowe.
  7. Dewi Indriasih, S. E. (2021). Whistleblowing: Wujudkan Tata Kelola Perusaahan Lebih Baik.
  8. Faisal, A. A. (2018). Pencegahan Dan Deteksi Kasus Korupsi Pada Sektor Publik Dengan Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v20i4.1238
  9. Fauziyyah, F., Ida Suraida, S. E., Ca, Ms. A. K., & Ak, B. S. S. E. M. (2019). Pengaruh Risk Based Internal Auditing Dan Whistleblowing System Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) (Survey Pada PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) Kota Bandung). Perpustakaan Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Unpas. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/id/eprint/43009
  10. Favere Marchesi, M., & Emby, C. (2018). The Alumni Effect and Professional Skepticism: An Experimental Investigation. Accounting Horizons, 32(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51920
  11. Gunawan, Y. (2019). Peran Dan Perlindungan Whistleblower (Para Pengungkap Fakta) Dalam Rangka Memberantas Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Law Review, 18(3), 262–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v18i3.1201
  12. Irawan, S. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah (Spip) Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (Bos)(Studi Pada Sekolah Dasar (Sd) Di Kecamatan Andir Kota Bandung). Fakultas Ekonomi Unpas Bandung. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/id/eprint/12025
  13. Kalorbobir, Y. M. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Auditor Internal Dalam Mendeteksi Dan Mencegah Fraud (Kecurangan) Pada Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Inspektorat Yogyakarta). Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta. http://eprints.mercubuana-yogya.ac.id/id/eprint/822
  14. Merrill, T. E. S., & Johnson, P. T. J. (2020). Towards A Mechanistic Understanding Of Competence: A Missing Link In Diversity–Disease Research. Parasitology, 147(11), 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182020000943
  15. Naomi, S., & Lampung, B. (2015). Penerapan Whistleblowing System Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Fraud. Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Bandar Lampung. http://feb.unila.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/26012015-10110311132.pdf
  16. Nurharjanti, N. N. (2017). Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Mengurangi Fraud Akademik: Whistleblowing Sistem. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 17(1), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v17i1.218
  17. Puspitha, M. Y., & Yasa, G. W. (2018). Fraud Pentagon Analysis In Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Study On Indonesian Capital Market). International Journal of Sciences: Basic And Applied Research, 42(5), 93–109. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/249336574.pdf
  18. Rahim, S., Muslim, M., & Amin, A. (2019). Red Flag and Auditor Experience Toward Criminal Detection Trough Profesional Skepticism. Jurnal Akuntansi, 23(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v23i1.459
  19. Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle And Sas No. 99. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
  20. Sudarma, K. A., Purnamawati, I. G. A., & Herawati, N. T. (2019). Pengaruh Persepsi Karyawan Mengenai Budaya Kejujuran Dan Whistleblowing System Dalam Pencegahan Fraud Pada Pt. Bpr Nusamba Kubutambahan. Jimat (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 10(3), 435–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v10i3.22815
  21. Sudarmanto, E. (2020). Manajemen Risiko: Deteksi Dini Upaya Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 9(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v9i2.2506
  22. Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, Dan R&D. Penerbit Cv. Alfabeta: Bandung, 225.
  23. Su’un, M., & Hajering, M. (2020). Professional commitment and locus of control toward intensity in whistleblowing through ethical sensitivity. Jurnal Akuntansi, 24(1), 100-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/ja.v24i1.659
  24. Wahyuni, E. S., & Nova, T. (2019). Analisis Whistleblowing System Dan Kompetensi Aparatur Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud (Studi Empiris Pada Satuan Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Bengkalis). Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 6(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.35314/inovbiz.v6i2.867
  25. Yorisca, Y. (2020). Pembangunan Hukum Yang Berkelanjutan: Langkah Penjaminan Hukum Dalam Mencapai Pembangunan Nasional Yang Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1), 98–111.