Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 638 Download : 428

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines and analyzes the impact of framing, audit tenure, and obedience pressure on audit judgment at KAP in South Jakarta, with auditor ethics as a moderating variable. This study's population consists of independent auditors employed by public accounting firms registered with IAPI who reside or work in one of five KAPs in South Jakarta. The sampling method utilized purposive sampling with the following criteria: 1) Senior auditors and 2) Auditors who have worked for more than five years; thus, the total sample size is 80 auditors. This study utilizes primary data collected by distributing questionnaires to all respondents containing multiple statements with four answer options, each of which will be assigned a weighted score (Strongly Agree = 4, Agree = 3, Disagree = 2, Strongly Disagree = 1). The collected data will undergo multiple testing phases before being analyzed. The analysis method employs the Structural Equation Model (SEM) and the Smart PLS application to analyze technical data. Our findings indicate that Framing and audit tenure has a positive and statistically significant effect on audit judgment. In contrast, obedience pressure negatively and statistically significantly affects audit judgment. These findings suggest that the greater the auditor's pressure, the less precise or reduced their audit judgment. An auditor subjected to intense obedience pressure from superiors and the entity being audited will tend to behave safely and provide a poor and inaccurate judgment. Auditor ethics can moderate the impact of framing and audit tenure on audit judgment but not the impact of obedience pressure. This indicates that auditor ethics, as a moderating variable, diminishes the effect of obedience pressure on audit judgment. When under pressure from the client or his superiors, an auditor is likelier not to perform some of the necessary auditing procedures.

Keywords

Framing Tenure Audit Compliance Pressure Judgment Audit Auditor Ethics

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Suryanti, H., & Nur, M. (2022). Ethical Moderation on Framing Relationships, Audit Tenure and Compliance Pressure on Audit Judgment. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(2), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v5i2.396
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anisma, Y., & Handani, R. (2014). Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, independensi, kompleksitas tugas dan etika terhadap audit judgment. Riau University. https://www.neliti.com/publications/33443/pengaruh-tekanan-ketaatan-independensi-kompleksitas-tugas-dan-etika-terhadap-aud
  2. Eyenubo, S. A., Mohamed, M., & Ali, M. (2017). The effect of audit tenure and financial reporting quality in Nigeria listed companies. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 1(9), 113–120. http://iijsr.com/data/uploads/2114.pdf
  3. Fitriyani, M. (2013). Pengaruh gender, tekanan ketaatan, kompleksitas tugas, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap audit judgment (study empiris pada kantor akuntan publik di Semarang). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/25764
  4. Haryanto, H. (2018). Pengaruh framing dan urutan bukti terhadap audit judgment: komparasi dan interaksi keputusan individu-kelompok. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 15(1), 1–36. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/akuditi/article/download/20483/13903
  5. Irawati, S. A., & Solikhah, B. (2018). The factors affecting audit judgment. Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v7i1.20776
  6. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315191157-9/theory-firm-managerial-behavior-agency-costs-ownership-structure-michael-jensen-william-meckling
  7. Kurniawan, F. (2020). Pengaruh self-efficacy, pengalaman auditor, tekanan ketaatan, kompleksitas tugas, framing, dan urutan bukti terhadap audit judgment (studi empiris pada kantor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/815
  8. Muslim, M., Pelu, M. F. A. R., & Mentari, K. S. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi auditor, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Bongaya Journal for Research in Accounting (BJRA), 1(2), 8–17. http://ojs.stiem-bongaya.ac.id/BJRA/article/download/78/44
  9. Nirmala, M. R. V., & Latrini, M. Y. (2017). Pengaruh keahlian, tekanan ketaatan, tekanan waktu terhadap kualitas audit judgment dengan kompleksitas tugas sebagai pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(1), 683–711. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/download/27963/18346
  10. Nurjanah, I. B., & Kartika, A. (2016). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, etika, pengalaman auditor, skeptisme profesional auditor, objektifitas dan integritas terhadap kualitas audit (studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Semarang). Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 5(2). https://unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe9/article/view/5826
  11. Pebriyantika, S. D. (2021). Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, pengalaman audit, gender, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment (studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Wilayah Surabaya). STIE Perbanas Surabaya. http://eprints.perbanas.ac.id/7653/
  12. Perdani, F. N., & Waluyo, I. (2016). Pengaruh framing, urutan bukti dan pengalaman kerja auditor terhadap audit judgment (studi kasus pada auditor yang bekerja di KAP Wilayah DIY dan Solo). Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu Akuntansi, 4(6). https://eprints.uny.ac.id/43046/1/Skripsu_Febrina Nur Perdani_12812141052.pdf
  13. Praditaningrum, A. S., & Januarti, I. (2012). Analisis faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap audit judgment (studi pada BPK RI perwakilan provinsi Jawa Tengah). Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/35528/
  14. Pratama, R. (2020). Pengaruh locus of control, framing dan kompetensi auditor terhadap audit judgment pada kantor akuntan publik di Kota Medan. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/10297
  15. Pratiwi, N. D. (2020). Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, independensi, kompleksitas tugas, pengalaman auditor dan kompetensi auditor terhadap audit judgment studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Tengah dan DIY. Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang. http://eprintslib.ummgl.ac.id/id/eprint/2122
  16. Putri, A. P., Nabila, N., Augustin, V., & Fellia, F. (2021). Audit tenure, auditor experience, independency, and task complexity on audit judgement. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 13(1), 7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v13i1.3506
  17. Putri, P. A., & Laksito, H. (2013). Pengaruh lingkungan etika, pengalaman auditor dan tekanan ketaatan terhadap kualitas audit judgment. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 383–393. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/3287
  18. Rashid, A., & Ghazi, M. S. (2021). Factors affecting Sharīʿah audit quality in Islamic banking institutions of Pakistan: a theoretical framework. Islamic Economic Studies. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IES-07-2020-0025/full/html
  19. Sari, D. I., & Ruhiyat, E. (2017). Pengaruh locus of control, tekanan ketaatan dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 9(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i2.9230
  20. Sitio, R. (2018). Pengaruh profesionalisme auditor, etika profesi dan pengalaman auditor terhadap pertimbangan tingkat materialitas. Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, 2(3). https://www.simantek.sciencemakarioz.org/index.php/JIK/article/view/9
  21. Sofiani, M. M. O. L. (2014). Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, pengalaman audit, dan audit tenure terhadap audit judgement. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(1), 270. http://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi-pajak/article/view/3108
  22. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.
  23. Syalfia, D. I. (2019). Pengaruh audit tenure dan due professional care terhadap audit judgment pada kantor akuntan publik kota Medan. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/5689
  24. Yanti, E. F. (2014). Pengaruh audit tenure dan lowballing terhadap pemberian opini audit. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/30941
  25. Yendrawati, R., & Mukti, D. K. (2015). Pengaruh gender, pengalaman auditor, kompleksitas tugas, tekanan ketaatan, kemampuan kerja dan pengetahuan auditor terhadap audit judgement. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 4(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol4.iss1.art1https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol4.iss1.art1
  26. Yuliyana, S., & Waluyo, I. (2018). Pengaruh framing dan independensi auditor terhadap audit judgment. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 7(2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v7i2.21348
  27. Yusuf, M. (2017). Pengaruh kompetensi, tekanan ketaatan dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 14(01), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.36406/jam.v14i01.190