Main Article Content

Abstract

This study looks at how the Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR) explicitly evaluates the effects of leverage, capital, and inventory intensity on tax avoidance. The present study was undertaken on the energy sector businesses listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period spanning from 2016 to 2019. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to choose 22 companies, comprising a dataset of 88 observations. The data were subjected to analysis and hypothesis testing using the STATA software. A panel data estimation model determination test was conducted, which indicated that the standard effect model was appropriate for this research. The testing steps encompass many statistical procedures: the classical assumption test, panel data regression analysis, coefficient of determination test, and partial test. The study revealed a notable favorable impact of leverage and inventory intensity on CETR. In contrast, the effect of capital intensity on CETR was shown to be statistically insignificant. The results of this study support the positive accounting theory, which says that managers choose assessment methods and measure financial statement elements based on self-interest and opportunistic behavior. Specifically, management may opt for strategies that minimize tax liabilities or align with the company's goals, such as efficient contracting behavior, which aims to mitigate the risk of tax avoidance. Implications for Tax authorities in Indonesia should consider financial indicators, notably leverage, and inventory intensity, as valuable indicators of potential tax avoidance, particularly within the energy industry.

Keywords

Leverage Capital Intensity Inventory Intensity Cash Effective Tax Rate Tax Avoidance Energy

Article Details

How to Cite
Maha Putra, D., & Putri Kirana , A. (2023). Impact of Leverage, Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Cash Effective Tax Rate on Tax Avoidance: Assessment for Energy Sector Corporate. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(2), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v6i2.4

References

  1. Amalia, R. F. (2019). Political Connection, Profitability, and Capital Intensity Against Tax Avoidance in Coal Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Researchm, 431, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200407.004
  2. Andhari, P. A. S., & Sukartha, I. M. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility, Profitabilitas, Inventory Intensity, Capital Intensity, dan Leverage pada Agresivitas Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 18(3), 2115–2142. https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/25794
  3. Arianandini, P. W., & Ramantha, I. W. (2018). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Kepemilikan Institusional Pada Tax Avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 22(3), 2088–2116. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2018.v22.i03.p17
  4. Astuti, T. P., & Aryani, Y. A. (2016). Tren Penghindaran Pajak Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Indonesia Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2001-2014. Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v20i3.4
  5. Dewi, A. S., Zusmawati, Z., & Lova, N. H. (2018). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Harga Saham Perusahaan dalam Indeks LQ45 Di BEI dengan Regresi Data Panel. Jurnal Pundi, 2(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.31575/jp.v2i2.71
  6. Dwiyanti, I. A. I., & Jati, I. K. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Capital Intensity, dan Inventory Intensity pada Penghindaran Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 27(3), 2293–2321. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v27.i03.p24
  7. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  8. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) Nomor 14 Tentang Persediaan.
  9. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) Nomor 16 Tentang Aset Tetap.
  10. Indrawan, D. A., Nuraini, M., Wulan, S. S., Sururi, U. T., & Mulyati, Y. (2021). Factors Affect Tax Avoidance (Empirical Study On The Mining Sector And Component Listed In The Indonesia Stock Exchange Throughout 2016-2019). Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 32(3), 6157–6164.
  11. Irdiana, S. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Struktur Modal Pada Perusahaan Katagori Saham Blue Chips Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode Tahun 2011-2014. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi Wiga, 6(1), 15-26.
  12. Jacob, Fatoki. Obafemi. F. (2014). An Empirical Study of Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance : A Critical Issue in Nigeria Economic Development. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(18), 22–27.
  13. Kayo, E. S. (2021). Saham per sektor IDX-IC (IDX Industrial Classification). Retrieved from Sahamu.com website: https://www.sahamu.com/daftar-saham-per-sektor-idx-industrial-classification/#A_Energi_Energy
  14. Kurniawan, M. I., & Nuryanah, S. (2017). The effect of corporate tax avoidance on the level of corporate cash holdings: Evidence from indonesian public listed companies. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(4), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i4.4
  15. Manihuruk, R. S., Arieftiara, D., & Miftah, M. (2021). Tax avoidance in the Indonesian manufacturing industry. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol3.iss1.art1
  16. Martani, D. (2018). STATA Part 1 - Basic menggunakan STATA.
  17. Matore, E. M., & Khairani, A. Z. (2020). The Pattern of Skewness and Kurtosis Using Mean Score And Logit In Measuring Adversity Quotient (AQ) For Normality Testing. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(1), 688–702.
  18. Maulana, A., Sari, R. H. D. P., & Wibawaningsih, E. J. (2021). Analisis pengaruh kompensasi eksekutif, profitabilitas perusahaan dan leverage terhadap tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2, 1151–1170.
  19. Maulana, T. I., & Muchtar, P. P. S. A. (2018). Modul Metode Penelitian Akuntansi. Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN.
  20. Musyarrofah, E., & Amanah, L. (2017). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Leverage, dan Size Terhadap Cash Effective Tax Rate. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 6(9), 1–16.
  21. Nugrahadi, E. W., & Rinaldi, M. (2021). The Effect of Capital Intensity and Inventory Intensity on Tax Avoidance at Food and Beverage Subsector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 163, 221–225. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210220.039
  22. Pitaloka, S., & Merkusiawati, N. K. L. A. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Komite Audit, dan Karakter Eksekutif Terhadap Tax Avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 27(2), 1202–1230. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v27.i02.p14
  23. Pohan, C. A. (2015). Manajemen Perpajakan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  24. Putra, P. D., Zainal, A., Thohiri, R., & Harahap, K. (2019). Factors Affecting Tax Avoidance In Indonesia And Singapore Practices: A View From Agency Theory. Labuan Bulletin of International Business &Finance, 17(2), 24–40.
  25. Putri, C. L., & Lautania, M. F. (2016). Pengaruh capital Intensity Ratio, Inventory Intensity Ratio, Ownership Strucutre Dan Profitability Terhadap Effective Tax Rate (ETR). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 1(1), 101–119.
  26. Putri, V. R., & Putra, B. I. (2017). Pengaruh Leverage, Profitability, Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Proporsi Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing, 19(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23917/dayasaing.v19i1.5100
  27. Rashid, N. M. N. N. M., Noor, R. M., Mastuki, N. A., & Bardai, B. (2015). Longitudinal study of corporate tax planning: Analysis on companies’ tax expense and financial ratios. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(May), 109–120.
  28. Suciarti, C., Suryani, E., & Kurnia, K. (2020). The Effect of Leverage, Capital Intensity and Deferred Tax Expense on Tax Avoidance. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 3(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v3i2.28624
  29. Sugianto, D. (2019). Mengenal soal Penghindaran Pajak yang Dituduhkan ke Adaro. Retrieved from detikFinance website: https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-4612708/mengenal-soal-penghindaran-pajak-yang-dituduhkan-ke-adaro
  30. Sunardi, N. (2019). Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Leverage Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2012-2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Forkamma. 2(3), 48-61.
  31. Susanti, C. M. (2018). Pengaruh Konservatisme, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 13(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v13i2.5021
  32. Syamsuddin, M., & Suryarini, T. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Intensitas Modal, Intensitas Persediaan, Komisaris Independen dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap ETR. Jurnal Penelitan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v5i1.2707
  33. Tarmidi, D. (2021). Mining Company Tax Minimization : Analysis of Internal and External Roles. International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research, 3(4), 168–174.
  34. Tobing, H. (2018). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Return on Asset, Leverage, Capital Intensity Dan Inventory Intensity Terhadap Tarif Pajak Efektif. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol. 15, pp. 2046–2069.
  35. Triyanto, H. U., & Zulvina, S. (2017). Analisis Perumusan Kebijakan Mandatory Disclosure Rules Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Mengatasi Praktik Penghindaran Pajak Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 1(1), 65-75.
  36. Wang, Y., Campbell, M., & Johnson, D. (2014). Determinants of Effective Tax Rate of China Publicly Listed Companies. International Management Review, 10(1), 10-20.
  37. Yulianty, A., Khrisnatika, M. E., & Firmansyah, A. (2021). Penghindaran Pajak pada Perusahaan Pertambangan di Indonesia: Profitabilitas, Tata Kelola Perusahaan, Intensitas Persediaan, Leverage. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (JPI), 5(1), 20–31