Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of operating leverage and financial leverage on earning per share (EPS) in the property and real estate sector of companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2017 to 2019. The results show that operating leverage has a positive and significant effect on EPS, while financial leverage has no significant effect on EPS. Simultaneously, both operating leverage and financial leverage have a positive and significant impact on EPS. The study suggests that investors should pay attention to the EPS of a company before making any investment decisions, as well as consider the use of debt on EPS to avoid potential losses. Additionally, the findings can assist companies in planning their operational funding through operating and financial leverage, and EPS can help maintain shareholders' trust and ensure their continued investment in the company. Thus, companies are advised to use debt wisely and consider EPS as a reference for investors when selecting company stocks.

Keywords

Operating Leverage Financial Leverage Earning Per Share

Article Details

How to Cite
Sapiri, M. (2023). Understanding Financial Leverage: The Effect of Operating Leverage and Financial Leverage on EPS in Property and Real Estate Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v6i1.598

References

  1. Afifuddin, A. (2022). The Regression Model Effect of Financial Ratio on Construction and Building Stock Price. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 2(1), 43-60.
  2. Alam, GM, Forhad, AR, & Ismail, IA (2020). Bisakah pendidikan sebagai 'Komoditas Internasional' menjadi tulang punggung atau tongkat suatu bangsa di era revolusi industri keempat? - Sebuah studi banding. Peramalan Teknologi dan Perubahan Sosial , 159 , 120184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120184
  3. Bouvard, M., & de Motta, A. (2021). Leverage tenaga kerja, kegagalan koordinasi, dan risiko agregat. Jurnal Ekonomi Keuangan , 142 (3), 1229–1252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.06.036
  4. Buchuk, D., Larrain, B., Muñoz, F., & Urzúa I., F. (2014). Pasar modal internal kelompok usaha: Bukti dari pinjaman intra-grup. Jurnal Ekonomi Keuangan , 112 (2), 190–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.01.003
  5. Caballero-Miguez, G., Garza-Gil, MD, & Varela-Lafuente, MM (2012). Perubahan hukum, sistem hak milik dan stabilitas kelembagaan: Kasus budaya rakit apung di sektor kerang Galicia. Manajemen Kelautan & Pesisir , 55 , 84–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.10.002
  6. Cao, VN (2015). Apa yang menjelaskan nilai premium? Kasus biaya penyesuaian, leverage operasi dan leverage keuangan. Jurnal Perbankan & Keuangan , 59 , 350–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.033
  7. de Haan, J., & Poghosyan, T. (2012). Volatilitas ukuran dan pendapatan perusahaan induk bank AS. Jurnal Perbankan & Keuangan , 36 (11), 3008–3016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.008
  8. Eilon, S. (1978). Penghasilan per saham dan pengambilalihan. Jurnal Perbankan & Keuangan , 2 (3), 257–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(78)90015-8
  9. Greasley, D., & Oxley, L. (2007). Paten, hak kekayaan intelektual, dan hasil sektoral dalam Revolusi Industri Inggris, 1780–1851. Jurnal Ekonometrika , 139 (2), 340–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.018
  10. Guthrie, G. (2011). Catatan tentang leverage operasi dan tingkat pengembalian yang diharapkan. Surat Penelitian Keuangan , 8 (2), 88–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2010.10.004
  11. Guthrie, G. (2013). Nilai premium tanpa leverage operasi. Surat Riset Keuangan , 10 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2012.10.001
  12. Imran, K., Usman, M., & Nishat, M. (2013). Kebijakan dividen bank: Bukti dari Pakistan. Pemodelan Ekonomi , 32 , 88–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.041
  13. Kustiyaningrum, D., Nuraina, E., & Wijaya, AL (2016). Pengaruh Leverage, Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, Dan Umur Obligasi Terhadap Peringkat Obligasi (Studi Pada Perusahaan Terbuka Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan , 5 (April), 25–40.
  14. Li, T., Lu, C., & Chen, Z. (2022). Konsekuensi yang tidak diinginkan dari pembiayaan berbasis agunan: Bukti dari perilaku biaya perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi & Ekonomi Kontemporer , 100338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2022.100338
  15. Li, Z., Li, Q., & Zeng, Y. (2020). Fleksibilitas kontraksi, leverage operasi, dan leverage keuangan. Jurnal Sains dan Teknik Manajemen , 5 (1), 43–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2020.02.002
  16. Mearns, M. (2012). Mengetahui pengetahuan apa yang harus dibagikan: Kolaborasi untuk komunitas, penelitian, dan satwa liar. Sistem Pakar dengan Aplikasi , 39 (10), 9892–9898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.187
  17. Pienaar, EF, Soto, JR, Lai, JH, & Adams, DC (2019). Akankah Penduduk Kabupaten Memilih Peningkatan Pajak Mereka untuk Melestarikan Habitat Asli dan Layanan Ekosistem? Konservasi Pendanaan di Palm Beach County, Florida. Ekonomi Ekologis , 159 , 24–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.011
  18. Rimadanti, S., Santoso, A., & Sulistyawati, A. I. (2022). The Role of Pentagon Fraud in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 2(2), 87-97.
  19. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Tata kelola perusahaan yang baik dan kinerja keberlanjutan perusahaan di Indonesia: Pendekatan triple bottom line. Heliyon , 7 (3), e06453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453
  20. Zhang, C., Liu, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Mencirikan referensi dari berbagai disiplin ilmu: Perspektif analisis isi kutipan. Jurnal Informatika , 15 (2), 101134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101134