Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 372 Download : 229

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the financial performance of the Jayapura City Education and Culture Office through the utilization of the Value for Money approach, which has three primary components: economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. This study is a descriptive research conducted to examine the financial performance of programs and activities within the Jayapura City Education and Culture Office. The study specifically focuses on analyzing the budget targets and actual outcomes as reported in the Jayapura City Education and Culture Office's Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) for the periods of 2019 and 2020. The employed methodology for data analysis is quantitative descriptive analysis, which aims to assess several dimensions of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. The present analysis is based on research findings about the performance of the Jayapura City Education and Culture Office in three specific programs. These programs include the Nine-Year Compulsory Education Program, the Improvement Program for the Development of Performance and Financial Reporting Systems, and the Procurement, Improvement, and Repair of Educational Facilities and Infrastructure Program. The findings of this study offer a comprehensive analysis of the financial performance of the Jayapura City Education and Culture Office, thereby serving as a valuable point of reference for enhancing and advancing future projects.

Keywords

Value for Money Economy Efficiency Effectiveness Financial Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rasyid, A. (2023). Local Government Financial Performance with a Value For Money Approach: Evidence from Jayapura Indonesia. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v6i1.656
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdul Halim, M. S. K. (2013). Akuntansi sektor publik: akuntansi keuangan daerah. Salemba Empat.
  2. Akbar, M. (2015). Penerapan prinsip prinsip new public management dan governance dalam reformasi administrasi. Reformasi, 5(2), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v5i2.323
  3. Annisa, D. (2017). Evaluasi kinerja keuangan dinas kesehatan kota makassar melalui pendekatan value for money. Universitas Hasanuddin. http://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/8891/2/dianannisa-1510-1-11-dian-a 1-2.pdf
  4. Ardila, I., & Putri, A. A. (2015). Analisis kinerja keuangan dengan pendekatan value for money pada pengadilan Negeri Tebing Tinggi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(1). https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/akuntan/article/view/428
  5. Bastian, I. (2014). Audit sektor publik: pemeriksaan pertanggungjawaban pemerintah. Salemba Empat.
  6. Fleming, F. (2013). Evaluation methods for assessing value for money. Australasian Evaluation Society. https://www.buttfreckle.com/uploads/filer_public/c7/4e/c74e0337-e2be-4583-af2c-7acd9c7de97a/evaluating_methods_for_assessing_vfm_compressed.pdf
  7. Hamid, A., & Lamuda, I. (2019). Evaluation of financial performance through approach to value for money evaluasi kinerja keuangan melalui pendekatan value for money. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(1), 1–11. http://repository.stiemahardhika.ac.id/id/eprint/2676
  8. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
  9. Koufteros, X., Verghese, A. J., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). The effect of performance measurement systems on firm performance: A cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.003
  10. Kurrohman, T. (2018). Evaluasi penganggaran berbasis kinerja melalui kinerja keuangan yang berbasis value for money di kabupaten/kota di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v5i1.2558
  11. Mardiasmo, D., & MBA, A. (2009). Akuntansi sektor publik. In Yogyakarta: Andi.
  12. Mardiasmo, M. B. A. (2021). Otonomi & manajemen keuangan daerah: Edisi Terbaru. Penerbit Andi.
  13. Martini, R., Lianto, N., Hartati, S., Zulkifli, Z., & Widyastuti, E. (2019). Sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah atas akuntabilitas pengelolaan keuangan dana desa di Kecamatan Sembawa. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v2i1.8364
  14. Moxham, C. (2009). Performance measurement: Examining the applicability of the existing body of knowledge to nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(7), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910971405
  15. Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. M., Wright, S., Bradbury, M., & Coulton, J. (2020). Business analysis and valuation: Using financial statements. Cengage AU.
  16. Syachbrani, W., & Akbar, R. (2015). Faktor-faktor teknis dan keorganisasian yang memengaruhi pengembangan sistem pengukuran kinerja pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 3(2). http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jrak/article/download/2112/2266
  17. Syafira, N. (2021). Kinerja keuangan Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Kebudayaan Kota Tangerang Selatan Tahun 2017-2019 dengan Konsep Value for Money. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. https://etheses.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/44744
  18. White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2016). The analysis and use of financial statements. John Wiley & Sons.