Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 231 Download : 158

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the impact of growth plans and quality costs on the performance of companies. The study sample consisted of 30 individuals, specifically managing authorities and ship construction professionals, who were affiliated with several shipyard enterprises in Jakarta. The sampling methodology employed is the census sampling method, which involves the utilization of all members of the population as samples. The major data utilized in this study was collected through the distribution of questionnaires to all participants. The employed methodology for data analysis encompasses descriptive statistical analysis, validity testing, reliability testing, and classical assumption testing. The latter includes normality testing, heteroscedasticity testing, multicollinearity testing, and autocorrelation testing. Additionally, all hypotheses are examined through partial testing, simultaneous testing, and coefficient of determination testing. The findings of this study suggest that the implementation of a growth plan has a statistically significant and favorable impact on enhancing the performance of PT Indonesian Ship Industry (Persero) in Jakarta. Similarly, there exists a positive and statistically significant correlation between the variable of quality cost and the performance of PT. Indonesian Ship Industry (Persero) in Jakarta. This implies that by investing in quality, there is a potential for significant enhancement in firm performance.

Keywords

Growth Strategy Cost of Quality Company Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hadita, H. (2022). Impact of Growth Plans and Quality Costs on Performance Companies. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(1), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v5i1.658
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abernathy, W. J., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2016). Parallel strategies in development projects. Management Science, 15(10), B-486. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.15.10.B486
  2. Anwar, M. (2019). Pengaruh antara risiko bisnis, strategi pertumbuhan, struktur modal terhadap kinerja perusahaan makanan dan minuman di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 7(2), 305–314. https://jurnaljam.ub.ac.id/index.php/jam/article/view/157
  3. Flanagan, R., & Tate, B. (2007). Cost control in building design. Wiley-Blackwell.
  4. Gantino, R., & Erwin, E. (2018). Pengaruh biaya kualitas terhadap penjualan pada PT. Guardian Pharmatama. Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting, 2(2), 138–167. https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/JAFA/article/view/159
  5. Handayani, F. (2020). Analisis biaya kualitas untuk mengurangi risiko terjadinya produk cacat pada joyok batu bata (studi empiris di Joyok Batu Bata). Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya. http://eprints.polsri.ac.id/8958/
  6. Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2014). Cornerstones of cost management. Cengage Learning.
  7. He, D. (2018). Engineering quality systems: Cost of quality. Modern Applied Science, 4(5), 102. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/86d7/a184db0e4d41e841f4b2243f29ec2cb284b4.pdf
  8. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard business press.
  9. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2016). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. https://www.academia.edu/download/32320664/Kaplan_Norton_Balanced_Scorecard_-_3_articles.pdf#page=36
  10. Knox, S. T. (2016). Modeling the cost of software quality. Digital Technical Journal, 5, 9. ftp://eddie.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/people/macro/DEC/DTJ/DTJC01/DTJC01PF.PDF
  11. Lingle, J. H., & Schiemann, W. A. (2016). From balanced scorecard to strategic gauges: is measurement worth it? Management Review, 85(3), 56. https://search.proquest.com/openview/8a829dadefaacd1daf3e99cc8f2035c0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=41493
  12. Mubarok, M. H. (2019). Strategi pertumbuhan unilever indonesia dalam mewujudkan nilai berkelanjutan. BISNIS: Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen Islam, 2(1), 101–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v2i1.5252
  13. Mustikowati, R. I., & Tysari, I. (2019). Orientasi kewirausahaan, inovasi, dan strategi bisnis untuk meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan (studi pada UKM sentra Kabupaten Malang). Jurnal Ekonomi MODERNISASI, 10(1), 23–37. https://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/jeko/article/view/771
  14. Nawangsasi, Y. (2017). Analisis dampak biaya kualitas terhadap produktivitas produksi. Jurnal Computech & Bisnis (e-Journal), 1(2), 137–145. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/291480093.pdf
  15. Ningtyas, H. (2018). Pengaruh biaya kualitas terhadap jumlah penjualan pada PT. Fajar Agung Medan. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/7572
  16. Novianto, E. (2019). Manajemen strategis. Deepublish.
  17. Parapat, A. (2018). Dampak strategi pertumbuhan terhadap kinerja PT. MNC Sky Vision, Tbk. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/5854
  18. Parengkuan, N. R. V. (2017). Dampak strategi pertumbuhan terhadap kinerja PT. Martina Berto, Tbk. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1126
  19. Radella, L., Saebani, A., & Maulana, A. (2021). Pengaruh biaya promosi, biaya kualitas, dan pertumbuhan penjualan terhadap perubahan laba bersih. Konferensi Riset Nasional Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 59–70. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/korelasi/article/view/1114
  20. Rakhman, F. F., & Tan Lian Soei, C. (2016). Dampak strategi pertumbuhan terhadap kinerja PT Ultrajaya Milk Industry & Trading Company Tbk. https://library.unpar.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=218525?p=show_detail&id=218525
  21. Santy, S. A. (2018). Pengaruh risiko bisnis, strategi pertumbuhan, dan struktur modal terhadap kinerja perusahaan (studi empiris terhadap perusahaan jasa yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2011). Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Musi Palembang. http://eprints.ukmc.ac.id/3498/
  22. Sower, V. E., Quarles, R., & Broussard, E. (2017). Cost of quality usage and its relationship to quality system maturity. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710722257
  23. Swandy, S. (2017). Pengukuran kinerja dengan metode balanced scorecard pada PT. Gunung Patsean Sumber Rejeki. BINUS. http://library.binus.ac.id/eColls/eThesisdoc/Abstrak/2007-1-00112-MN_Abstrak.pdf
  24. Tan Lian Soei, C. (2018). Dampak strategi pertumbuhan terhadap kinerja PT. Eagle High Plantations, Tbk. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/7145
  25. Tandiontong, M., Sitanggang, F., & Carolina, V. (2018). Pengaruh biaya kualitas terhadap tingkat profitabilitas perusahaan (studi kasus pada The Majesty Hotel and Apartment, Bandung). Akurat Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 2, 1–17. https://www.academia.edu/download/32422059/602.pdf
  26. Usman, R. (2017). Pengaruh biaya kualitas terhadap kinerja balanced scorecard perusahaan manufaktur berskala besar. Sumber, 133(017), 9. https://www.academia.edu/download/86774929/1-Rudi-Usman1.pdf
  27. Veronita, R. (2017). Dampak strategi pertumbuhan terhadap kinerja PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur, Tbk. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/1129
  28. Winarno, S. H. (2015). Analisis pengaruh biaya kualitas terhadap tingkat keuntungan perusahaan (studi kasus pada CV. Meranti Manunggal Furniture). Moneter-Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(2). https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/moneter/article/view/976
  29. Wisnubroto, P., & Irawati, N. (2018). Analisis pengukuran kinerja dengan metode balanced scorecard. Jurnal Teknologi, 1(2), 178–190. https://journal.akprind.ac.id/index.php/jurtek/article/view/787
  30. Yamit, Z. (2012). Manajemen kualitas produk dan jasa. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Ekonesia.