Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 278 Download : 199

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact of Total Quality Management, the reward system, and environmental uncertainty on managerial performance. This research had a sample of 81 participants who were selected from 81 organizations that implement Total Quality Management (TQM) and have obtained the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) certification, namely the Indonesian National Standard (SNI). To ascertain the sample size, the selected sample criteria consist of one respondent who holds the Production Manager or Marketing Manager role within each organization. The utilized data source consists of primary data directly obtained by researchers from respondents through administering a questionnaire instrument. The proposed data analysis approach examines the research instrument, including validity and reliability tests. The use of multiple linear regression analysis, t-tests, and f-tests will come after performing traditional assumption tests. The introduction of Total Quality Management (TQM) and the development of a reward system have had a noteworthy and favorable impact on managers' performance within several Manufacturing Companies situated in the Nusantara Bonded Zone. This finding substantiates the significance of allocating resources to implement effective quality management strategies and providing suitable incentives to enhance managerial performance. On the other hand, it is noteworthy that environmental uncertainty exerts a substantial adverse impact on managerial performance, underscoring the imperative for organizations to possess the capability to predict and effectively navigate this uncertainty to sustain optimal performance levels.

Keywords

Total Quality Management Reward System Environmental Uncertainty Managerial Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Poernomo, H., Suryadnyana, N. A., Sjam, J. M. E., & Supriadi, T. (2023). Total Quality Management, Reward System and Environmental Uncertainty on Managerial Performance. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v6i1.671
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Azmi, Z., & Savitri, E. (2015). Pengaruh total quality management, sistem pengukuran kinerja, sistem penghargaan terhadap kinerja manajerial (studi empiris pada perusahaan asuransi di Pekanbaru). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(2), 1–15. https://jnse.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFEKON/article/view/8839
  2. Blocher, E. J., Stout, D. E., Juras, P. E., & Smith, S. (2019). Cost management (a strategic emphasis) 8e. McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Chandrarin, G., & Tearney, M. G. (2020). The effect of reporting of exchange rate loses on the stock market reaction. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1). http://www.ijar-iaikapd.or.id/index.php/ijar/article/view/34
  4. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (2016). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 16–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247520
  5. Darya, I. G. P. (2016). Pengaruh ketidakpastian lingkungan dan karakteristik kewirausahaan terhadap kompetensi usaha dan kinerja usaha mikro kecil di kota Balikpapan. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (AJIE), 1(01), 65–78. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/2736
  6. Dauhan, J. (2018). Total quality management, budaya organisasi pengaruhnya terhadap kinerja manajerial PT. PLN Area Suluttenggo Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.1.4.2013.3419
  7. Fauzi, A. (2020). Manajemen kinerja. Airlangga university press.
  8. Febrianti, R., & Fitri, Y. (2019). Pengaruh karakteristik informasi sistem akuntansi manajemen, ketidakpastian lingkungan, dan desentralisasi terhadap kinerja manajerial (studi empiris pada perusahaan BUMN di Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 4(3), 456–470. https://scholar.archive.org/work/za3m3vse45dlrca6djnmi3fieu/access/wayback/http://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKA/article/download/12578/pdf
  9. Frestilia, N. (2018). Pengaruh pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, karakteristik informasi sistem akuntansi manajemen, dan ketidakpastian lingkungan terhadap kinerja manajerial. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1). https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/akt/article/view/97
  10. Gaspersz, V. (2011). Total quality management: untuk praktisi bisnis & industri. Bandung: Vincristo Publication.
  11. Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2013). Perilaku organisasi: manajemen sumberdaya manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
  12. Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2013). Management accounting: buku 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  13. Hardini, R. (2018). Pengaruh interaksi antara total quality management, sistem pengukuran kinerja dan sistem penghargaan terhadap kinerja manajerial pada PDAM Surabaya. STIE Perbanas Surabaya. http://eprints.perbanas.ac.id/1495/
  14. Kumentas, C. N. (2018). Pengaruh TQM, sistem pengukuran kinerja dan penghargaan terhadap kinerja manajerial Pt. Pos Indonesia. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.1.3.2018.1888
  15. Kurnianingsih, R., & Indriantoro, N. (2021). Pengaruh sistem pengukuran kinerja dan sistem penghargaan terhadap keefektifan penerapan teknik total quality management studi empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1). http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.49
  16. Lubis, H. Z. (2018). Pengaruh total quality management terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan sistem pengukuran kinerj sebagai variabel moderating (studi pada perusahaan manufaktur di KIM). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 8(1). https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/akuntan/article/download/445/406
  17. Lunenburg, F. C. (2017). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 14(1), 1–6. http://nationalforum.com/Electronic
  18. Luthans, F. (2015). Organizational behavior 10 th edition. Penerjemah Vivin Andhika Yuwono, Shekar Purwanti, Th. Arie P., Dan Winong Rosari. Andi Yogyakarta.
  19. Milliken, F. J. (2007). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360294647626629888
  20. Mintje, N. (2018). Pengaruh TQM, sistem penghargaan dan sistem pengukuran kinerja terhadap kinerja manajerial pada PT. Air Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.1.3.2013.1939
  21. Mulyadi, J. S. (2017). Sistem perencanaan dan pengendalian manajemen. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.
  22. Mulyadi, S. (2017). Sistem akuntansi edisi 3. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  23. Murdijaningsih, T., Cahyo, H., Setiawan, H., & Arinastuti, A. (2017). Interaksi total quality management dan sistem reward terhadap kinerja manajerial pada BPR di Kabupaten Banyumas. Performance: Jurnal Personalia, Financial, Operasional, Marketing Dan Sistem Informasi, 24(2), 36–41. http://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/performance/article/download/698/820
  24. Narsa, I. M., & Yuniawati, R. D. (2018). Pengaruh interaksi antara total quality management dengan sistem pengukuran kinerja dan sistem penghargaan terhadap kinerja manajerial studi empiris pada Pt. Telkom Divre V Surabaya. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 18–34. http://ced.petra.ac.id/index.php/aku/article/view/15698
  25. Pamungkas, K. T. (2015). Pengaruh total quality management terhadap kinerja manajerial (studi empiris di perusahaan daerah Pasar Surya). AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v6n2.p178-194
  26. Pradnyaningtias, R. (2019). Pengaruh total quality management dan partisipasi penganggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial pada PT Tolan Tiga Indonesia. Universitas Sumatera Utara. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/65091
  27. Rahmiyati, R. (2016). Pengaruh total quality management (TQM) dan ketidakpastian lingkungan terhadap kinerja manajerial (studi empiris pada perusahaan perbankan di Kota Padang). Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(1). https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/akt/article/view/1528
  28. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Essentials of organizational behavior. In Pearson (Vol. 12). https://id1lib.org/book/5156824/48bfac
  29. Semekto, A. (2021). Ketidakpastian lingkungan dan lingkup sistem informasi akuntansi manajemen terhadap kinerja manajerial pada usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah (UMKM) di Surabaya. JRAP (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan), 8(2), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.2021.008.02.19
  30. Sitawati, R. (2016). Analisis pengaruh total quality management (TQM) terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan gaya kepemimpinan, sistem pengukuran kinerja, dan sistem penghargaan sebagai variabel moderating. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi, 23(40). http://ejurnal.stiedharmaputra-smg.ac.id/index.php/JEMA/article/view/229
  31. Subkhi, A., & Jauhar, M. (2013). Pengantar teori dan perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
  32. Swari, N. P. L. R. I., & Wirasedana, I. W. P. (2017). Pengaruh sistem penghargaan, total quality management (tqm), sistem pengukuran kinerja, dan ketidakpastian lingkungan terhadap kinerja manajerial. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 21(1), 830–856. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/download/33722/20857
  33. Wulandari, D. A., Cahyono, Y. T., & MM, A. (2016). Pengaruh total quality management, sistem pengukuran kinerja, sistem penghargaan, dan komitmen organisasi terhadap kinerja manajerial (studi kasus pada Perusahaan Batik Danar Hadi). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/45642