Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 181 Download : 164

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines effects of budgetary goal characteristics that are budgetary participation, budget goal clarity, budget goal difficulty, budgetary feedback on managerial performance using regression analysis (stepwise). This study also examined the contingency theory to seen the fit between budgetary goal characteristics system and environment on organization effectiveness, in this case budgetary system and perceived environmental uncertainty (PEU) to increasing managerial performance using residual approach. The application of residual analysis is illustrated by examining the interaction fit of budgetary goal characteristics and perceived environmental uncertainty and their effect on managerial performance. Residual approach used to enhance the potential for model of fit and be unformattable for future management accounting contingency theory studies. Based on the response of 64 managers in Makassar Industrial Area. The results of the study showed that that budgetary participation and budget goal clarity tend to have positive and significant effect on managerial performance. The results related to influence of budgetary goal’s difficulty level (about right, tight but attainable, too tight) to the average of managerial performance also showed insignificant relationship. This study showed that lack of fit between budgetary participation and budgetary goal clarity to environment uncertainty have negative and significant correlation with managerial performance.

Keywords

Budgetary Participation Budget Goal Clarity Budget Goal Difficulty Budgetary Feedback Managerial

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Oktavianus Pasoloran, Adelisa Matasik, & Fransiskus Randa. (2023). Model of Fit Perceived Environment Uncertainty (PEU) and Budgetary Characteristics on Managerial Performance: A Residual Approach. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(2), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v6i2.709
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali Almohtaseb, A., A Kareem Shaheen, H., Mohummed Alomari, K., & Yousef Almahameed, M. A. (2020). Impact of Talent Management on Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of an Effective Performance Management System. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n4p11
  2. Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Alam, G. M., Ashfaq, K., & Usman, M. (2023). Environmental MCS package, perceived environmental uncertainty and green performance: in green dynamic capabilities and investment in environmental management perspectives. Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-01-2022-0005
  3. Bris, A., Wang, T. Y. H., Zatzick, C. D., Miller, D. J. P., Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., Gregoire, D. A., Shepherd, D. A., Westphal, J. D., Shani, G., Troster, C., Van Quaquebeke, N., Lanaj, K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Barnes, C. M., Harmon, S. J., Feldman, E. R., DesJardine, M. R., … Sangiorgi, F. (2021). KNIGHTS, RAIDERS, AND TARGETS - THE IMPACT OF THE HOSTILE TAKEOVER - COFFEE,JC, LOWENSTEIN,L, ROSEACKERMAN,S. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 37(1).
  4. Cantarelli, C. C., Flybjerg, B., Molin, E. J. E., & Wee, B. van. (2018). Cost Overruns in Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Projects. Automation in Construction, 2(1).
  5. Chiluwal, E. K., & Bhandari, M. (2017). Construction Practice of Small Hydropower Projects in Nepal matematics View project Ethics in Construction Management View project Anjay kumar Mishra. In International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (Vol. 5, Issue 4).
  6. Chong, V. K., & Leung Tak-Wing, S. (2003). Testing a model of the motivational role of budgetary participation on job performance: A goal setting theory analysis. In Asian Review of Accounting (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060760
  7. Dos Santos, V., Beuren, I. M., & Marques, L. (2021). Fair design and use of the budgetary process and managerial performance. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 32(85). https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057X202010750
  8. Dowd, J., McGonigle, W., & Djatej, A. (2010). The optimal level of budgetary goal difficulty: an experimental study. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2010.033288
  9. Ezzamel, M. (1990). The impact of environmental uncertainty, managerial autonomy and size on budget characteristics. Management Accounting Research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5005(90)70057-1
  10. Goddard, A., & Mkasiwa, T. A. (2016). New public management and budgeting practices in Tanzanian Central Government “Struggling for conformance.” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2014-0018
  11. Henttu-Aho, T., & Järvinen, J. (2013). A Field Study of the Emerging Practice of Beyond Budgeting in Industrial Companies: An Institutional Perspective. European Accounting Review, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.758596
  12. Hermawan, A. A., Bachtiar, E., Wicaksono, P. T., & Sari, N. P. (2021). Levers of control and managerial performance: the importance of belief systems. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.62612
  13. Ichsan, M., Sadeli, J., Jerahmeel, G., & Yesica, Y. (2023). The role of project management office (PMO) manager: A qualitative case study in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2210359
  14. Jansson, M., Herbert, E., Zalar, A., & Johansson, M. (2022). Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom? In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084852
  15. Junjunan, M. I., Nawangsari, A. T., & Abdani, F. (2020). Budget Participation dan Psychological Capital Pada Creative Attitude di Sekolah Muhammadiyah Unggul Jawa Timur. Journal of Accounting Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v4i2.1080
  16. Kewo, C. L. (2014). The Effect of Participative Budgeting , Budget Goal Clarity and Internal Control Implementation on Managerial Performance. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(12).
  17. Kumar, M. (2020). Entrepreneurship Ecosystem and Development of Entrepreneurship in Pakistan. Open Journal of Business and Management, 08(04). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2020.84109
  18. Kuroki, M., & Motokawa, K. (2021). Do non-financial performance and accrual-based cost information affect public sector budgeting? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2021-0056
  19. Lau, C. M., & Caby, J. (2010). The effects of national culture on the role of participation in different task situations. Advances in Accounting, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2010.01.002
  20. Liutyi, I., & Bilyavska, O. (2021). Peculiarities of budgeting in a classical university as a condition of financial autonomy. Herald of Economics, 2. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2021.02.039
  21. Lunardi, M. A., Silva Zonatto, V. C. da, & Nascimento, J. C. (2019). Relationship between leadership style, encouragement of budgetary participation and budgetary participation. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(150). https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.150.2974
  22. Machmud, M., Hamzah, F. F., Nurfadila, N., Saffanah, N., & Akmalia, A. (2022). Locus of Control Moderating the Influence of Budgeting Participation on Managerial Performance. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v5i2.354
  23. Maditinos, D. I., Tsinani, A. V, & Šević, Ž. (2015). Managerial optimism and the impact of cash flow sensitivity on corporate investment: The case of Greece. International Journal of Business & Economic Sciences Applied Research, 8(2).
  24. Matsoso, M. L., Nyathi, M., & Nakpodia, F. A. (2021). An assessment of budgeting and budgetary controls among small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from a developing economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-04-2020-0082
  25. Mazorodze, A. H., & Buckley, S. (2019). Knowledge management in knowledge-intensive organisations: Understanding its benefits, processes, infrastructure and barriers. SA Journal of Information Management, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.990
  26. McCloskey, D. (1999). Other Things Equal - Economical Writing: An Executive Summary. Eastern Economic Journal, 25(2).
  27. Mozgovoy, V. (2022). Does psychological work environment matter? Relationship between psychological climate reflecting individual perception of work environment and stress among public servants. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2010483
  28. Rizzo, M. G. (2023). Exploring the relationship between performance feedback and medical managers’ budgetary performance:The role of managerial self-efficacy. Health Services Management Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848231179177
  29. Roreng, P. P., Tangdialla, L. P., & Rasinan, D. (2019). The effect of perceived task uncertainty (PTU) toward relationship between characteristics targeting of budgeting with management performance. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(8).
  30. Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2009). The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning. Vision Research, 49(21). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.003
  31. Sisto, R., López, J. G., Quintanilla, A., de Juanes, Á., Mendoza, D., Lumbreras, J., & Mataix, C. (2020). Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410583
  32. Smolarek, M., & Dziendziora, J. (2022). Impact of Personal Branding on the Development of Professional Careers of Managers. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXV(Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2833
  33. Sofyani, H., Simali, M. F. I. S., Najda, T., & Al-maghrebi, M. S. (2020). The Role of Budgetary Participation and Environmental Uncertainty in Influencing Managerial Performance of Village Government. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2102148
  34. Susilowati Mardjono, E., & Nur DP, E. (2016). An investigation of the effect of accounting controls, budget goal clarity, mental model implementation on accountability of government performance. Journal of Economics, Business and Accountancy Ventura, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v18i3.503
  35. Upadhyay, D. (2021). Consideration of future consequences and decision-making patterns as determinants of conflict management styles: CFC and conflict management styles. IIMB Management Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2021.03.006
  36. Vierlboeck, M., Gövert, K., Trauer, J., & Lindemann, U. (2019). Budgeting for agile product development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019-Augus. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.223
  37. Visedsun, N., & Terdpaopong, K. (2021). The effects of the strategy and goal on business performance as mediated by management accounting systems. Economies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040149
  38. Zatonatska, T., Hubska, M., & Shpyrko, V. (2022). Marketing Strategies in the Banking Services Sector With the Help of Data Science. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-11
  39. Zhang, Y., Li, L., & Lu, X. (2022). Critical Evaluated the Contingency Theories of Leadership and Trait Theories of Leadership more Useful for Leaders in Organisation. Article in Journal of Environmental Management, November.