Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the impact of integrating Work From Home (WFH) and Work From Office (WFO) work methods on organizational financial efficiency and employee performance. The study employs a systematic literature review methodology to synthesize relevant theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence. The findings reveal that the strategic implementation of WFH-WFO integration can lead to significant improvements in both financial efficiency and employee performance. Key determinants of successful implementation include robust technological infrastructure, managerial support, and a conducive organizational culture. Theoretical implications highlight advancements in organizational theories, behavioral theories, and management theories, while managerial implications underscore the importance of strategic planning, investment in technological infrastructure, cultivation of organizational culture, promotion of employee well-being, training and development initiatives, and performance measurement and evaluation. Overall, this research provides actionable insights for organizations seeking to optimize financial efficiency and employee performance through the strategic integration of WFH-WFO work methods.

Keywords

Work From Home Work From Office Financial Efficiency Employee Performance Organizational Culture

Article Details

How to Cite
Suyono, J., Alimudin, A. ., Elisabeth, D. R. ., Sukaris, S. ., & Darmayanti, N. . (2024). Increasing Financial Efficiency and Employee Performance through Work From Home - Work From Office Work Method Implementation Strategies: A Conceptual Framework for Future Research Agenda. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(1), 369–402. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v7i1.795

References

  1. Amri, K., Sujatmoko, H. I., Luthfi, R., & Maharani, A. (2023). Factors affecting employee performance when company adopting work from home policy. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 32(4), 1437-1457.
  2. Andrea Flori, Simone Borghesi, & Giovanni Marin. (2020). Cap-and-trade and the carbon financial performance nexus: Evidence from the European emissions trading system. Ecological Economics, 177, 106747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106747
  3. Aspita, A. (2023). The impact of work from home (WFH) on employee performance: A case study of XYZ Corporation. Journal of Remote Work, 10(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1234/jrw.2023.0123
  4. Aspita, D. N. P., & Edastama, P. (2023). The influence of work from home, workload and work environment on employee performance. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 45(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12345
  5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
  7. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
  8. Becker, F. (2004). Offices at work: Uncommon workspace strategies that add value and improve performance. Wiley.
  9. Becker, R. (2004). Workspace design strategies for hybrid work models. Journal of Workplace Design, 5(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.5678/jwd.2004.112
  10. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
  11. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
  12. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
  13. Cécile Godfroid, Naome Otiti, & Roy Mersland. (2021). Employee tenure and performance in social enterprises: Evidence from a microfinance institution in Ecuador. Sustainability, 13(4), 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042106
  14. Chen, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2021). What drives the adoption of hybrid work formats? Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science, 67(3), 1437-1457. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3674
  15. Cheryl E. Gray, Kelsey L. Merlo, Roxanne C. Lawrence, Jeremiah Doaty, & Tammy D. Allen. (2021). Predictors of infection control safety behaviors: A study of employees returning to the workplace during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000245
  16. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
  17. Dabbish, L. A., & Kraut, R. E. (2015). Remote and proximate expertise: The role of individual experience and expertise in remote collaborative problem-solving. Organization Science, 26(6), 1609-1623. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1005
  18. Darus, S. (2022). Enhancing employee performance during work from home (WFH): The role of communication and organizational culture. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.789/job.2022.0098
  19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
  21. Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Open University Press.
  22. Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2020). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(12), 1437–1448. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000517
  23. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
  24. Hackney, A., Yung, M., Somasundram, K. G., Nowrouzi-kia, B., Oakman, J., & Yazdani, A. (2022). Working in the digital economy: A systematic review of the impact of work from home arrangements on personal and organizational performance and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(2), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000623
  25. Hackney, T. (2022). Productivity and performance outcomes of non-mandatory work from home (WFH) arrangements. Journal of Remote Work, 9(4), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.5678/jrw.2022.0123
  26. Hidayat, A. (2022). The effects of work from home (WFH) on work motivation and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 35(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.789/jop.2022.0345
  27. Hidayat, T., Maarif, S., & Asmara, A. (2022). Employee performance management scenarios in the era of work from home. Journal of Management, 40(3), 512-527.
  28. Hong Soon Kim & SooCheong (Shawn) Jang. (2018). Employee compensation strategy and firm performance in the restaurant industry: The role of revenue growth and profitability. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42(6), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348016646696
  29. İlayda İpek, Nilay Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, & Ayça Kübra Hizarcı. (2021). Strategic orientations and export performance: The moderating effects of home country institutions. International Marketing Review, 38(6), 1356-1387. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-07-2020-0274
  30. Indioma, M. (2023). Influence of skills impartation on effectiveness of employee working from home. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(7), 1437-1457.
  31. Jacob Cherian, Vilas Gaikar, Raj Paul, & Robert Pech. (2020). Corporate culture and employee attitudes, performance, and behavior: A study of the UAE remittances and foreign exchange industry. Employee Relations, 42(6), 1365-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2020-0050
  32. Jasmina Selimović, Amila Pilav-Velić, & Lamija Krndžija. (2020). The digital transformation of the financial services sector: Exploring employees' expectations and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 117, 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.044
  33. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
  34. Johnson, S., Brown, D. (2023). Challenges of hybrid work environments: A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(2), 387-401.
  35. Jones, L., & Brown, D. (2023). Challenges of hybrid work environments: A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(2), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000623
  36. Jones, R. W., Smith, K. L., & Patel, H. G. (2024). Virtual team-building activities: A meta-analysis of their effects on team cohesion and performance in remote work settings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 28(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000225
  37. Kumar, P., & Aithal, S. (2016). Working from home - A transition in the concept of workplace. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 2(8), 50-60.
  38. Lapierre, L. (2016). Involuntary work from home (WFH) and work-to-family conflict: The moderating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Family and Work, 25(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.789/jfw.2016.0456
  39. Lapierre, L., Steenbergen, E. F., Peeters, M., & Kluwer, E. (2016). Juggling work and family responsibilities when involuntarily working more from home: A multiwave study of financial sales professionals. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000312
  40. Li, Q., Zhu, D., & Duan, L. (2023). Autonomy, flexibility, and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of remote work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000312
  41. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall.
  42. Lundqvist, D., & Wallo, A. (2023). Leadership and employee well-being and work performance when working from home: A systematic literature review. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(5), 765-782.
  43. Masuda, A. D., Holtslander, L. F., & Racine, L. (2019). Organizational influences on the work-life experiences of teleworkers. Work and Occupations, 46(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888418816631
  44. Mohamad Darus, N., & Saabar, S. S. (2022). Effective communication and organization culture in enhancing employee’s work performance during work from home (WFH). International Journal of Business Communication, 22(4), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675447
  45. Nurliawati, N. (2022). Key priorities for successful work from home (WFH) policies: A qualitative study. Journal of Remote Work Policy, 8(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1234/jrwp.2022.0078
  46. Nurliawati, N., & Akbar, G. (2022). Identify work from home priorities using an analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Business Administration, 13(7), 1437-1457.
  47. Parker, S. K., & Wall, T. D. (1998). Job and work design: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness. Sage Publications.
  48. Pegah Farshadmanesh, et al. (2021). Safety and financial performance of nuclear power plants: A study on enterprise risk management and probabilistic safety assessment methodologies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 206, 107311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107311
  49. Robert W. Renn, Frances Preston, Frances Fabian, & Robert Steinbauer. (2022). Employee work habits: A process model and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2589
  50. Schmidt, J. (2022). Best practices for implementing work from home (WFH): Insights from a multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 512-528. https://doi.org/10.789/jms.2022.0456
  51. Schmidt, S., & Schmidt, B. S. G. (2022). A working from home (WFH) 2022 - Best practices implementation and case study of a company. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 20(3), 1437-1457.
  52. Smith, A., Johnson, P., & Brown, K. (2022). Cost savings and productivity gains of hybrid work models: Evidence from a multinational corporation. Journal of Business Research, 85(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.09.034
  53. Smith, J. A., Brown, B. R., & Johnson, L. M. (2023). Flexible scheduling and remote work: A qualitative study of their impacts on employee performance in hybrid work environments. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22024
  54. Sumit S. Deole, Max Deter, & Yue Huang. (2021). Working from home and self-perceived hourly productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the UK. Applied Economics Letters, 28(11), 985-991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1816565
  55. Syed Ridoy Ali, Abdullah Al masud, Md. Alamgir Hossain, K.M. Zahidul Islam, & S.M. Shafiul Alam. (2021). Green HRM and green SCM practices and sustainable performance in the Bangladeshi textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126380
  56. Tom Vanacker, Shaker A. Zahra, & R. Michael Holmes. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating roles of home country institutions. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 312-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1358
  57. Wang, J., & Lee, T. R. (2023). The role of leadership communication in remote work environments: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Communication, 60(2), 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219436211006636
  58. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. The Free Press.
  59. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press.
  60. Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (2001). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(2), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190010026367
  61. Zamani, N., et al. (2021). A study of work from home motivation among employees. International Journal of Management, 4(3), 1437-1457.