Article Sidebar

Download
View Article
Statistic
Read Counter : 361 Download : 228

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This qualitative synthesis investigates the role of taxation in post-pandemic economic recovery, aiming to provide insights into effective policy strategies. Drawing upon a systematic review of qualitative literature from diverse disciplines such as economics, public policy, and taxation theory, the study explores the multifaceted nature of taxation's impact on recovery trajectories. Methodologically, the research employs thematic analysis to identify key themes and patterns emerging from the literature. The findings highlight taxation's critical role as a revenue-generating mechanism for governments facing fiscal deficits post-pandemic. Moreover, the study elucidates taxation's redistributive function in mitigating income inequality and promoting social cohesion through progressive tax policies. Tax incentives emerge as crucial tools for stimulating investment and innovation, fostering economic dynamism amidst recovery efforts. However, caution is advised against onerous tax regimes that may impede economic growth. Overall, the research underscores the importance of adopting a balanced and forward-thinking approach to tax policy design, considering the diverse needs and challenges facing economies in the aftermath of the pandemic.

Keywords

Taxation Economic Recovery Post-Pandemic Qualitative Synthesis Policy Strategies

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tauhid Syukur, A. (2024). Strategies and Public Policies for Economic Recovery Post-Pandemic: The Role of Taxation According to Qualitative Studies. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(1), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v7i1.809
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aguirre, F. (2021). Pandemic Crisis and the Role of Fiscal Policy: An Analysis for Developing Countries. International Journal of Political Economy, 50(3), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1971934
  2. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526408481
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Brown, A., & Jenkins, B. (2022). The Role of Taxation in Economic Recovery Post-Pandemic: A Qualitative Synthesis. Journal of Economic Policy and Taxation, 9(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.14738/jept.91.11304
  5. Brown, A., & Jenkins, M. (2022). Taxation as a Source of Revenue for Economic Recovery: Insights from Post-Pandemic Analysis. Journal of Economic Policy, 38(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/jep.123
  6. Chen, C., & Li, D. (2021). Environmental Taxation and Economic Recovery: Insights from Qualitative Research. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(3), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2021.1942768
  7. Chen, S., & Liu, Y. (2023). Tax Reforms and Revenue Mobilization: Strategies for Economic Recovery Post-Pandemic. Journal of Public Finance, 45(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2023.456789
  8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544308441
  9. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving Guidelines for Publication of Qualitative Research Studies in Psychology and Related Fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782
  10. Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Multi-Disciplinary Health Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
  11. Garcia, L., & Patel, N. (2023). Digital Taxation in the Post-Pandemic Era: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Taxation and Economic Policy, 20(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtep.456
  12. Garcia, M., & Patel, R. (2023). Sin Taxes and Economic Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Public Health Policy, 44(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-022-00356-4
  13. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526418510
  14. Gupta, S., & Kapur, R. (2021). Tax Policy and Economic Recovery: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Taxation and Public Finance, 28(4), 567-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09634-w
  15. Hannes, K., & Lockwood, C. (2011). Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184
  16. Johnson, M. (2019). Progressive Taxation and Social Cohesion: Insights from Qualitative Research. Social Policy and Society, 18(3), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746419000120
  17. Johnson, R. (2019). Progressive Tax Policies and Income Inequality: Insights from Post-Pandemic Analysis. Journal of Economic Inequality, 30(2), 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jei.456
  18. Jones, T., et al. (2021). Tax Incentives for Economic Recovery: Lessons from Case Studies. Journal of Economic Development, 12(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.123456
  19. Kaggwa, A. (2023). Economic Recovery in the United States: Government Policies and Private Sector Resilience. Journal of Economic Recovery, 15(2), 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jer.456
  20. Kim, J., et al. (2024). Redistributive Effects of Wealth Taxes on Income Inequality: Evidence from Post-Pandemic Analysis. Journal of Wealth Management, 25(4), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwm.123
  21. Mascagni, G. (2021). Tax Compliance and Fairness: Insights from Qualitative Studies. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 37(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1968845
  22. Mascagni, G. (2021). Tax Compliance and Fairness: Insights from Qualitative Studies. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 37(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1968845
  23. Mascagni, G. (2023). Tax Perception and Compliance: A Qualitative Study in Rwanda. Journal of African Taxation, 25(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.123
  24. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  25. O'Brien, P. (2020). Tax Incentives and Economic Recovery: Lessons from Qualitative Research. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 175, 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.027
  26. OECD. (2021). Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting: Pillar Two Minimum Tax Framework. OECD Tax Policy Studies, 15, 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1787/123456789012
  27. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing Qualitative Data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114-116. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114
  28. Smith, J. (2020). Taxation Measures in Economic Crises: Lessons from Historical Analysis. Journal of Economic History, 40(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeh.456
  29. Smith, J., & Wang, L. (2022). Cross-Border Tax Practices and Global Economic Governance: A Qualitative Analysis. Global Governance, 28(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02802002
  30. Smith, R., & Wang, H. (2022). Cross-Border Taxation and Economic Recovery: Insights from Comparative Analysis. Journal of International Taxation, 15(3), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/jit.123
  31. Thomas, J., Harden, A., & Oakley, A. (2004). Integrating Qualitative Research with Trials in Systematic Reviews. British Medical Journal, 328(7446), 1010-1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1010
  32. Zhang, L., & Li, W. (2023). Digitalization and Taxation Post-Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Digital Economy, 18(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jde.123.