Green Human Resource Management dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior for Environment: Menelusuri Peran Ganda (Double-Edged) Work Stress

Authors

  • Silva Dorista Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Program Studi Manajemen, Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Roby Sambung Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Program Studi Manajemen, Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Injilly Karmetha Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Program Studi Manajemen, Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Rina Aprilianti Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Program Studi Manajemen, Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Yeri Santika Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Program Studi Manajemen, Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v9i3.2468

Keywords:

green human resource management, organizational citizenship behavior for environment, work stress, emotional exhaustion, green burnout, conservation of resources theory

Abstract

Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) telah berkembang menjadi paradigma strategis untuk mengintegrasikan keberlanjutan lingkungan ke dalam praktik manajemen sumber daya manusia. Meskipun GHRM secara konsisten dikaitkan dengan penguatan Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment (OCBE), peran ambivalen work stress dalam relasi tersebut belum terpetakan secara memadai. Dengan menyintesis 78 artikel terindeks Scopus, Web of Science, dan Emerald Insight (2015-2024) menggunakan protokol PRISMA 2020, studi ini memadukan sintesis tematik dengan pemetaan sains bibliometrik. Bukti yang terkumpul menegaskan hubungan positif GHRM OCBE yang kuat melalui jalur motivasi intrinsik, identitas hijau, dan pertukaran sosial. Namun secara paralel, GHRM juga membangkitkan work stress yang benar-benar bermata dua: eustress hijau mengakselerasi perilaku ekologis sukarela, sedangkan distress kronis yang termanifestasi sebagai emotional exhaustion, eco-fatigue, dan green burnout melemahkan OCBE secara signifikan. Arah pengaruh tersebut bersifat kontingen pada kualitas kepemimpinan, iklim organisasi hijau, serta sumber daya psikologis karyawan. Secara teoretis, artikel ini mengembangkan kerangka integratif yang memadukan Conservation of Resources (COR) dan Social Exchange Theory (SET), sekaligus menyoroti keterbatasan metodologis yang persisten dominasi desain lintas-seksi, common method bias, serta minimnya bukti longitudinal dan eksperimental yang membingkai agenda riset ke depan.

References

Ali, M., Usman, M., Soetan, G. T., Saeed, M., & Rofcanin, Y. (2023). Spiritual leadership and work alienation: Analysis of mechanisms and constraints. The Service Industries Journal, 43(11–12), 822–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1961138

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Blanco-Encomienda, F. J., García-Canté, E., & Latorre-Medina, M. J. (2023). Green human resource management and organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in the hospitality sector. Sustainability, 15(9), 7501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097501

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.

Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1138-9

Boiral, O., Talbot, D., & Paillé, P. (2015). Leading by example: A model of organizational citizenship behavior for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1835

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x

Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364

Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650308315439

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21792

Hameed, Z., Khan, I. U., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Naeem, R. M. (2020). Do green HRM practices influence employees’ environmental performance? International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0407

Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M., & Phetvaroon, K. (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.007

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Paillé, P., Valéau, P., & Renwick, D. W. S. (2020). Leveraging green human resource practices to achieve environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121137

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. (2016). Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: The role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x

Ren, S., Tang, G., & Jackson, S. E. (2018). Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 769–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9532-1

Ren, S., Tang, G., & Jackson, S. E. (2021). Effects of green HRM and CEO ethical leadership on organizations’ environmental performance and employee work stress. International Journal of Manpower, 42(6), 1018–1039. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0414

Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x

Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, S., Khan, I., Tahir, M., & Afridi, M. A. (2019). Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1694

Tang, G., Ren, S., Wang, M., Li, Y., & Zhang, S. (2022). Employee green behaviour: A dual-pathway model of challenge–hindrance green demands and work stress. Journal of Business Research, 150, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.024

Wang, Z., Xu, H., & Liu, Y. (2022). When green human resource management backfires: The role of green burnout in employees’ environmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148512

Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., & Fawehinmi, O. O. (2020). Green human resource management: A systematic literature review from 2007 to 2019. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(7), 2005–2027. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0438

Zhang, Y., Luo, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2023). Eco-fatigue and green burnout: A longitudinal examination of the dark side of green human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 136083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136083

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

How to Cite

Dorista, S., Sambung, R. ., Karmetha, I. ., Aprilianti, R. ., & Santika, Y. . (2026). Green Human Resource Management dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior for Environment: Menelusuri Peran Ganda (Double-Edged) Work Stress. Paradoks : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(3), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v9i3.2468

Issue

Section

Articles