Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to identify the appropriate authority responsible for managing rig-owned transportation within Pertamina Hulu Rokan Zone 4 by employing mixed-method approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Value-Focused Thinking (VFT) generates values, alternatives, and objectives. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) quantifies and prioritizes criteria and alternatives. VFT, through expert interviews, enhances the initial set of criteria and alternatives by introducing additional sub-criteria and alternatives. AHP is then employed to prioritize the outputs from VFT through a structured computational process. Ultimately, the selected authority established a new operation support function, which is preferred over the existing SCM-RAM system and the Well Intervention (self-managed) alternative
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Affandi, Z. D., & Novani, S. (2023). Implementing Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Oil Production Scenario from TMB & KRG Field Development: Case Study of PT Pertamina Hulu Rokan Zone 4. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.3.1937
- Aruldoss, M. (2013). A Survey on Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods and Its Applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1).
- Darraji, R., Golshan Khavas, R., & Tavakoli Kashani, A. (2024). Public Involvement in Transportation Decision Making: A Comparison between Baghdad and Tehran. Infrastructures, 9(9), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9090151
- HajShirmohammadi, A., & Wedley, W. C. (2004). Maintenance management – an AHP application for centralization/decentralization. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410526839
- Höfer, T., von Nitzsch, R., & Madlener, R. (2019). Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501616
- Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, P., Singhal, S., & Sharma, P. (2014). Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007
- Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(96)00004-5
- Koczkodaj, W. W., Mikhailov, L., Redlarski, G., Soltys, M., Szybowski, J., Tamazian, G., Wajch, E., & Yuen, K. K. F. (2016). Important Facts and Observations about Pairwise Comparisons (the special issue edition). Fundamenta Informaticae, 144(3–4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2016-1336
- Kriswardhana, W., Toaza, B., Esztergár-Kiss, D., & Duleba, S. (2025). Analytic hierarchy process in transportation decision-making: A two-staged review on the themes and trends of two decades. Expert Systems with Applications, 261, 125491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125491
- Kumar, A., & A, R. (2020). An MCDM framework for assessment of social sustainability indicators of the freight transport industry under uncertainty. A multi-company perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(5), 1023–1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0272
- Kuo, T., & Chen, M.-H. (2023). On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means. Information Sciences, 648, 119630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119630
- Logullo, Y., Bigogno-Costa, V., Silva, A. C. S. da, & Belderrain, M. C. (2022). A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations. Production, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210059
- Madudova, E., & Dávid, A. (2019). Identifying the derived utility function of transport services: case study of rail and sea container transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.153
- Mohamed, A., Stone, S., & Oloufa, A. A. (2024). Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Autonomous Truck Strategies of Commercial Vehicles. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9702. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219702
- Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., Alkharabsheh, A., Duleba, S., & Esztergar-Kiss, D. (2023). A Systematic Review of Analytic Hierarchy Process Applications to Solve Transportation Problems: From 2003 to 2022. IEEE Access, 11, 11973–11990. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234298
- Önden, İ., & Eldemir, F. (2022). A multi-criteria spatial approach for determination of the logistics center locations in metropolitan areas. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 44, 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100734
- Rivero Gutiérrez, L., de Vicente Oliva, M. A., & Romero-Ania, A. (2021). Managing Sustainable Urban Public Transport Systems: An AHP Multicriteria Decision Model. Sustainability, 13(9), 4614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094614
- Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
- Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
- Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
- Ulutaş, A., Popovic, G., Radanov, P., Stanujkic, D., & Karabasevic, D. (2021). A NEW HYBRID FUZZY PSI-PIPRECIA-COCOSO MCDM BASED APPROACH TO SOLVING THE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY SELECTION PROBLEM. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1227–1249. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15058
- Wang, Y., Zhou, R., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Government Functional Departments based on VFT-AHP Data Analysis (pp. 363–373). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-056-5_52
- Winowoda, B., & Wasesa, M. (2024). VFT and AHP Approach to Selecting the Best Option in Decision-Making at PLN: A Case Study in the Cawang-Gandul Project. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.2.2103
- Yalcin Kavus, B., Gulum Tas, P., Ayyildiz, E., & Taskin, A. (2022). A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions. Journal of Air Transport Management, 99, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102179
- Yannis, G., Kopsacheili, A., Dragomanovits, A., & Petraki, V. (2020). State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005
References
Affandi, Z. D., & Novani, S. (2023). Implementing Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Oil Production Scenario from TMB & KRG Field Development: Case Study of PT Pertamina Hulu Rokan Zone 4. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.3.1937
Aruldoss, M. (2013). A Survey on Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods and Its Applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1).
Darraji, R., Golshan Khavas, R., & Tavakoli Kashani, A. (2024). Public Involvement in Transportation Decision Making: A Comparison between Baghdad and Tehran. Infrastructures, 9(9), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9090151
HajShirmohammadi, A., & Wedley, W. C. (2004). Maintenance management – an AHP application for centralization/decentralization. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410526839
Höfer, T., von Nitzsch, R., & Madlener, R. (2019). Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501616
Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, P., Singhal, S., & Sharma, P. (2014). Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007
Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(96)00004-5
Koczkodaj, W. W., Mikhailov, L., Redlarski, G., Soltys, M., Szybowski, J., Tamazian, G., Wajch, E., & Yuen, K. K. F. (2016). Important Facts and Observations about Pairwise Comparisons (the special issue edition). Fundamenta Informaticae, 144(3–4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2016-1336
Kriswardhana, W., Toaza, B., Esztergár-Kiss, D., & Duleba, S. (2025). Analytic hierarchy process in transportation decision-making: A two-staged review on the themes and trends of two decades. Expert Systems with Applications, 261, 125491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125491
Kumar, A., & A, R. (2020). An MCDM framework for assessment of social sustainability indicators of the freight transport industry under uncertainty. A multi-company perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(5), 1023–1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0272
Kuo, T., & Chen, M.-H. (2023). On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means. Information Sciences, 648, 119630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119630
Logullo, Y., Bigogno-Costa, V., Silva, A. C. S. da, & Belderrain, M. C. (2022). A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations. Production, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210059
Madudova, E., & Dávid, A. (2019). Identifying the derived utility function of transport services: case study of rail and sea container transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.153
Mohamed, A., Stone, S., & Oloufa, A. A. (2024). Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Autonomous Truck Strategies of Commercial Vehicles. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9702. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219702
Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., Alkharabsheh, A., Duleba, S., & Esztergar-Kiss, D. (2023). A Systematic Review of Analytic Hierarchy Process Applications to Solve Transportation Problems: From 2003 to 2022. IEEE Access, 11, 11973–11990. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234298
Önden, İ., & Eldemir, F. (2022). A multi-criteria spatial approach for determination of the logistics center locations in metropolitan areas. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 44, 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100734
Rivero Gutiérrez, L., de Vicente Oliva, M. A., & Romero-Ania, A. (2021). Managing Sustainable Urban Public Transport Systems: An AHP Multicriteria Decision Model. Sustainability, 13(9), 4614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094614
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
Ulutaş, A., Popovic, G., Radanov, P., Stanujkic, D., & Karabasevic, D. (2021). A NEW HYBRID FUZZY PSI-PIPRECIA-COCOSO MCDM BASED APPROACH TO SOLVING THE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY SELECTION PROBLEM. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1227–1249. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15058
Wang, Y., Zhou, R., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Government Functional Departments based on VFT-AHP Data Analysis (pp. 363–373). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-056-5_52
Winowoda, B., & Wasesa, M. (2024). VFT and AHP Approach to Selecting the Best Option in Decision-Making at PLN: A Case Study in the Cawang-Gandul Project. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.2.2103
Yalcin Kavus, B., Gulum Tas, P., Ayyildiz, E., & Taskin, A. (2022). A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions. Journal of Air Transport Management, 99, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102179
Yannis, G., Kopsacheili, A., Dragomanovits, A., & Petraki, V. (2020). State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005