Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 121 Download : 88

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Maybelline's VTO on consumer purchase intention mediated by immersion, perceived enjoyment, and perceived ease of use. This study uses a quantitative approach with an online survey method to 185 respondents, namely women aged 18 years and over who have used the Maybelline VTO feature. The results of the study indicate that the interactivity and virtuality of the VTO feature have a significant effect on immersion and perceived ease of use, but not on perceived enjoyment. The mediating variables of perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use significantly increase consumer purchase intention. This finding confirms that VTO features that are interactive, easy to use, and provide a pleasant experience can encourage purchasing decisions.

Keywords

Virtual Try On Immersion Perceived Enjoyment Perceived Ease of Use Purchase intention

Article Details

References

  1. Balaji, M., Raghavan, S., & Jha, S. (2011). Role of tactile and visual inputs in product evaluation: A multisensory perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Logistics, 23(4), 513–530.
  2. Barrera, K. G., & Shah, D. (2023). Marketing in the Metaverse: Conceptual understanding, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 155.
  3. Burns, A. C., & Veeck, A. F. (2019). Marketing Research (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
  4. Chaudhry, N. E., Subhani, W., Naz, M. A., Nazir, M. U., & Ameer, M. H. (2023). The Mediating Role of Interactivity between Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Enjoyment and Intention to Use Augmented Reality Application for Shopping. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 7 (6), 66-78.
  5. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. I., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J. Retaill, 77 (4), 511-535.
  6. Cho, H., & Schwarz, N. (2012). I like your product when I like my photo: misattribution using interactive virtual mirrors. J. Interact. Mark., 24, 235-243.
  7. Choi, Y.K. and Taylor, C.R. (2014). How do 3-dimensional images promote products on the Internet?. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2164-2170.
  8. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  9. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. MIT Sloan School of Management.
  10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q, 13 (3), 319-340.
  11. Dieck, M. T., Prim, A. C. E., & Bamford, D. (2023). The effects of augmented reality shopping experiences: immersion, presence and satisfaction. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17 (6), 940-958.
  12. Do, H., Shih, W. and Ha, Q. (2020). Effects of mobile augmented reality apps on impulse buying behavior: an investigation in the tourism field. Heliyon, 6 (8), 1-9.
  13. Dogra, P., Kaushik, A. K., Kalia, P., & Kaushal, A. (2023). Influence of augmented reality on shopping behavior. Management Decision, 61 (7), 2073-2098.
  14. Gadalla, E., Keeling, K., & Abosag, I. (2013). Metaverse-retail service quality: A future framework for retail service quality in the 3D internet. Journal of Marketing Management, 29 (13), 1493-1517.
  15. Ghafoor, R.Z., Hussain, S. and Ahmad, A. (2023). Changing online shopping experiences: investigating quality of augmented reality (AR) experience on behavioral intentions using S-O-R theory. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 8 (1).
  16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  17. Han, K. S. (2023). An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Virtual Reality Advertising on Recall and Attitude According to Presence and Immersion. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 10 (1), 189-202.
  18. Hawkins, D. I., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Kleiser, S. B. (2019). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  19. Hilken, T., Ruyter, K. d., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keling, D. I. (2017). Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., 45, 884-905.
  20. Hu, X., Au, N., & Xia, R. (2024). The Impact of Mobile Augmented Reality on the Purchase Intention of Intangible Cultural Heritage Handicrafts. Journal of China Tourism Research.
  21. Hwangbo, H., Kim, E. H., Lee, S. H., & Jang, Y. J. (2020). Effects of 3D Virtual ‘‘Try-On’’ on Online Sales and Customers’ Purchasing Experiences. Digital Object Identifier, 10.
  22. Islam, T., Miron, A., Liu, X., & Li, Y. (2024). StyleVTON: A multi-pose virtual try-on with identity and clothing detail preservation. Neurocomputing, (594).
  23. Ivanov, A., Head, M., & Biela, C. (2023). Mobile shopping decision comfort using augmented reality: the effects of perceived augmentation and haptic imagery. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35 (8), 1917-1934.
  24. Javornik, A. (2016). Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour. J. Retail. Consum. Serv, 252-261.
  25. Jiang, Q., Sun, J., Yang, C., & Gu, C. (2022). The Impact of Perceived Interactivity and Intrinsic Value on Users’ Continuance Intention in Using Mobile Augmented Reality Virtual Shoe-Try-On Function. Systems, 10 (3).
  26. Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (4th ed.). Pearson.
  27. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2015). Marketing Management, Global Edition (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
  28. Maryani, Prabowo, H., Gaol, F. L., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2023). Measuring the Influence of Mobile Prototype Augmented Reality Applications for Written Batik Clothes using the SOR Model. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13 (6), 244-267..
  29. Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A., 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. the MIT Press.
  30. Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2020). Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101912.
  31. Plotkina, D., & Saurel, H. (2019). Me or just like me? The role of virtual try-on and physical appearance in apparel M-retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 362-377.
  32. Poushneh, A., & Parraga, A. Z. V. (2017). Discernible impact of augmented reality on retail customer's experience, crossmark satisfaction and willingness to buy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 229-234.
  33. Putri, A. K., & Syah, M. F. J. (2024). THE ROLE OF IMMERSION AS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN VISIBILITY, META VOICING,AND GUIDANCE SHOPPING ON PURCHASE INTENTION. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7 (1), 1853-1872.
  34. Qin, H., David, A., Harun, A., Mamun, M. R. A., Peak, D., & Prybutok, V. (2024). Assessing user benefits and privacy concerns in utilitarian and hedonic mobile augmented reality apps. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124 (1), 442-482.
  35. Qin, H., Peak, D. A., & Prybutok, V. (2021). A virtual market in your pocket: How does mobile augmented reality (MAR) influence consumer decision making?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58.
  36. Schmalstieg, D., & Höllerer, T. (2016). Augmented Reality: Principles and Practice. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
  37. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (19th ed.). ALFABETA BANDUNG.
  38. Wahyudin, M. A., & Aksari, N. M. A. (2024). The Effect of Augmented Reality Virtual Try-On on Purchase Intention Mediated by Perceived Enjoyment (Study on Revlon Products in Denpasar City). Asian Journal of Management Analytics (AJMA), 3 (4), 1003-1020.
  39. Yim, M.Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., Sauer, P.L., 2017. Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for E-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. J. Interact. Mark. 39, 89–103.
  40. Zhao, Y., Wang, A. and Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: a stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers and Education, 144.
  41. Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.