Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan lanskap pengetahuan terkait kesejahteraan karyawan dalam bidang manajemen sumber daya manusia (MSDM) melalui pendekatan bibliometrik. Sejumlah 148 artikel di database scopus dari tahun 2003-2025 dianalisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan biblioshiny dan VosViewer. Rentang waktu tahun 2003 didasarkan pada terbitnya UU No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan yang melandasi pembangunan ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sebanyak 521 penulis terlibat dalam eksplorasi dan evaluasi isu kesejahteraan karyawan di Indonesia dengan tingkat international co-authorship sebesar 15.54%. Tahun 2023 dan 2024 menjadi tahun paling publikasi paling produktif dengan ditemukan 23 dan 37 dokumen yang dipublikasikan. Berbagai kata kunci penting ditemukan seperti “job satisfaction”, “male” “female”, adult,” “middle aged”, dan “health care” yang menandai bahwa kesejahteraan karyawan mengarah pada kepuasan kerja dan hasilnya dapat berbeda bergantung karakteristik demografinya, yang juga akan berpengaruh terhadap tingkat kesehatan karyawan. Terdapat tiga kelompok klaster yang di antaranya Klaster Merah: Perspektif Organisasi dan Kinerja Karyawan, Klaster Hijau: Dimensi Demografis dan Operasional, dan Klaster Biru: Makro Konteks, Isu Mental Health, dan Pengaruh Eksternal.

Keywords

Kesejahteraan Karyawan Manajemen Sumber Daya manusia Mental Health Kepuasan Kerja

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ali, K. T. M., & Sivasubramanian, R. C. (2024). Understanding the Nexus Between Techno-Stress, Psychological Well-Being, and the Moderating Role of Job Resources in the Gig Economy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-024-09505-5
  2. Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2006). The Resource-Based View: Origins and Implications. In The Blackwell Handbook ofStrategic Management (First, Issue 1, pp. 63–86). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228075-4
  3. Chuang, Y. T., Chiang, H. L., & Lin, A. P. (2025). Insights from the Job Demands–Resources Model: AI’s dual impact on employees’ work and life well-being. International Journal of Information Management, 83(July 2024), 102887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102887
  4. Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097
  5. Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K., & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.26421238
  6. Jing, T., Li, X., Yu, C., Bai, M., Zhang, Z., & Li, S. (2023). behavioral sciences Examining Medical Staff Well-Being through the Application and Extension of the Job Demands – Resources Model : Behavioral Sciences, 13, 1–16. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/behavsci
  7. Kashyap, S., Sanskrity Joseph, & Deshmukh, G. K. (2016). Employee well-being, life satisfaction and the need for work-life balance. Journal of Ravishankar University, Part-A, November, 11–23. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gopal-Deshmukh/publication/311322121_Employee_Well-Being_Life_Satisfaction_and_the_need_for_Work-Life_balance/links/58419b8608aeda6968138468/Employee-Well-Being-Life-Satisfaction-and-the-need-for-Work-Life-balance.pdf
  8. Kemnaker RI. (2024). Kondisi Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia Tahun 2021 - 2023. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia, Ketenagakerjaan Umum. https://satudata.kemnaker.go.id/infografik/59
  9. Kovich, M. K., Simpson, V. L., Foli, K. J., Hass, Z., & Phillips, R. G. (2023). Application of the PERMA Model of Well-being in Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-022-00184-4
  10. Li, Y., Chen, C., & Yuan, Y. (2025). Evolving the job demands-resources framework to JD-R 3.0: The impact of after-hours connectivity and organizational support on employee psychological distress. Acta Psychologica, 253(January), 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104710
  11. Liang, W. lih, Nguyen, D. N., Tran, Q. N., & Truong, Q. T. (2023a). Employee welfare and firm financial performance revisited. Managerial Finance, 49(2), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2022-0095
  12. Liang, W. lih, Nguyen, D. N., Tran, Q. N., & Truong, Q. T. (2023b). Employee welfare and firm financial performance revisited. Managerial Finance, 49(2), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2022-0095
  13. Lin, D., Tang, X., Li, H., & He, G. (2023). An empirical research on employee welfare and internal control quality. PLoS ONE, 18(8 August), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290009
  14. McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic Versus Eudaimonic Conceptions of Well-being: Evidence of Differential Associations With Self-reported Well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9698-0
  15. Midtbøen, A. H., & Nadim, M. (2022). Navigating to the Top in an Egalitarian Welfare State: Institutional Opportunity Structures of Second-generation Social Mobility. International Migration Review, 56(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211014829
  16. Nishikawa, Y., Hashemi Joo, M., & Okafor, C. E. (2022). Board co-option and employee welfare. Managerial Finance, 48(8), 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2021-0580
  17. Parhizkar, H., Taddei, P., Weziak-bialowolska, D., Mcneely, E., Spengler, D., Guillermo, J., & Laurent, C. (2023). Employee pension welfare and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from the enterprise annuity system in China. Building and Environment, 110984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102768
  18. Rahmani, K., Gnoth, J., & Mather, D. (2018). Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A psycholinguistic view. Tourism Management, 69(June), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.008
  19. Razzaque, A., Lee, I., & Mangalaraj, G. (2023). The effect of entrepreneurial leadership traits on corporate sustainable development and firm performance: a resource-based view. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-03-2023-0076
  20. Rozubi, N. C., & Li, L. P. (1989). the Development of Psychological Well-Being Programme Based on Six Factormodel Psychological Well-Being Ryff (1989). International Journal of Information Research and Review, 2(1989), 1176–1180. http://www.ijirr.com
  21. Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being. In Measuring Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0005
  22. Sonnentag, S., Tay, L., & Nesher Shoshan, H. (2023). A review on health and well-being at work: More than stressors and strains. Personnel Psychology, 76(2), 473–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12572
  23. Soren, A., & Ryff, C. D. (2023). Meaningful Work, Well-Being, and Health: Enacting a Eudaimonic Vision. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(16), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166570
  24. Su, L., Tang, B., & Nawijn, J. (2020). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being pattern changes: Intensity and activity. Annals of Tourism Research, 84(June), 103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103008
  25. Taher, M. (2012). Resource-Based View Theory. In Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society (Vol. 28, Issue May, p. 461). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2
  26. Zeshan, M., Morelli, M., Rasool, S., Centobelli, P., & Cerchione, R. (2024). Empowering sustainable workplaces: A perspective on employee well-being in the light of the job demand resource model. Sustainable Development, December 2023, 1861–1878. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3179
  27. Zhai, Q., & Xu, L. (2025). Employee welfare and earnings management. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102(July 2024), 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104076