Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 446 Download : 583

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study attempts to explain the various economic potentials created as a result of the domino effect of the development and development of the Mandalika Special Economic Zone in Central Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara Province by mapping regional potentials whose development can be accelerated with capital assistance from foreign and domestic investment processes ( PMA and/or PMDN), which consists of data on several potential sectors that can be developed and built by expecting funding sources from investment or investment from outside. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection methods using literature studies and interviews. The results show that there are several sectors that have the potential to support the development of the Mandalika Special Economic Zone in Central Lombok Regency. These sectors include tourism, agriculture, marine and fishing, where the agricultural, marine, and fishing sectors are the buffers of the tourism sector in the supply of raw materials for the food and beverage industry. The findings also explain that, although developing quite rapidly, tourism-supporting industries such as accommodation and F&B have not been able to meet the needs of the tourism sector in Central Lombok, so the potential for economic development is still very wide open. Therefore, the right strategy by utilizing economic network incentives from the existence of SEZs in attracting investment can be relied upon to accelerate the development of existing economic potential.

Keywords

Special Economic Zone Mandalika Investation Regional Economy

Article Details

References

  1. Abdinagoro, SB (2020). Develop and market regional investment. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka.
  2. Bappeda of Central Lombok Regency. (2021). Mid-Term Regional Development Plan of Central Lombok Regency for 2021-2026. Pray.
  3. Central Lombok Regency BPS. (2021). Regional Statistics of Central Lombok Regency. Praya: Central Lombok Central Statistics Agency.
  4. Central Lombok Regency BPS. (2021). Central Lombok Regency in Figures. Praya: Central Lombok Central Statistics Agency.
  5. Central Lombok Regency BPS. (2018). Central Lombok Regency in Figures. Praya: Central Lombok Central Statistics Agency.
  6. National Council for Special Economic Zones of the Republic of Indonesia (DN KEK RI). (2021). Tourism SEZ profile, Mandalika SEZ. Taken back from https://kek.go.id/kawasan/Mandalika
  7. Central Lombok Regency Agriculture Office. (2019). Profile of the Department of Agriculture: Information on Development Achievements and Agricultural Statistics 2016-2018. Praya: Central Lombok District Agriculture Office.
  8. Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of Central Lombok Regency. (2020). Marine and Fisheries Profile 2019. Praya: Marine and Fisheries Office of Central Lombok Regency.
  9. Dornbusch, R. (1989). Real exchange rates and macroeconomics: A selective survey. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 401-432.
  10. Dunning, JH (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
  11. ESCAP. (2017). Handbook on policies promotion and facilitation of foreign direct investment for sustainable development in asia and the pacific. Thailand: United Nations Publication.
  12. Fatihudin, D. (2019). Dissecting investment reaps economic stretching. Yogyakarta: Depublish.
  13. Getler, PJ, & Blalock, G. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of International Economics, 402-421.
  14. Jeddawi, M. (2005). Stimulating investment in the era of regional autonomy. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
  15. Kanom. (2015). Kuta Lombok development strategy as a sustainable tourism destination. MEET Volume 1 Number 2, 25-42.
  16. Katadata. (2021, September 15). Katadata Databooks. Taken back from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/03/08/di-level-asean-daya-saing-logistik-indonesia-peringkat-ke-5
  17. Lipsey, RE (2001). Foreign direct investment and the operation of multinational firms: Concepts, history and data. NBER Working Paper No. 8665.
  18. Loewendahl, H., & Barklie, G. (2018, 45). How to Identify Target Sectors for Inward Investment. Taken back from WAVTEQ: https://www.wavteq.com/uploads/htis_final.pdf.
  19. Loewendahl, H., & Bryan, S. (2019). Investment promotion strategy development guide. Jakarta: Canada-Indonesia Trade and Private Sector Assistance Project.
  20. Indonesian media. (2021, September 16). Amid a Pandemic Investment in NTB Exceeds Target. Taken back from mediaindonesia.com: https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/358223/di-tengah-pandemi-investasi-di-ntb-lampaui-target
  21. Meier, GM (2001). Frontiers of development economics: The future in perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Mold, A. (2004). FFDI and poverty reduction: A critical re-appraisal of the arguments. Retrieved from the Economic Commission for Africa: http://region-developpement.univ-tln.fr/en/pdf/R20/R20_Mold.pdf.
  23. Rodan, R. (1943). Problems of industrialization of eastern and south-eastern europe. Economic Journal, 202-211.
  24. Sukirno, S. (2000). Modern macroeconomics. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  25. Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2016). Making Global Value Chains Work for Development. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  26. TSA. (2019). Investment Promotion Strategy Development Guide. Jakarta: TPSA Project.
  27. UNCTAD. (2011). World Investment Report 2011: Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
  28. UNCTAD. (2018). World investment report 2018: Investment and new industrial policies. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
  29. UNCTAD. (2021). World Investment Report 2021: Investing in Sustainable Recovery. Geneva: United Nations Publications.
  30. WAIPA. (2019). Overview of investment promotion: Report of teh findings from WAIPA annual survey of 2018. Geneva: WAIPA.
  31. WAVTEQ. (2017). Guidelines for handling investor inquiries. Jakarta: TPSA Project.
  32. World Bank. (2004). World Development Report 2005: A better investment climate for everyone. Washington DC: Oxford University Press.
  33. World Bank. (2017). Doing Business 207: Equal opportunity for all. 14th edition. Washington DC: World Bank.
  34. World Bank. (2021, September 15). Logistics Performance Index. Retrieved from https://lpi.worldbank.org.