Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on the export growth of Indonesia's leading specialized products. A sample of this study was selected by identifying every commodity that holds more than a 25% share in the international market. The five specialized products also represent Indonesia's leading sectors, which include the manufacturing industry (palm oil, HS Code: 151190, and coconut oil, HS Code: 151319), agricultural products (rubber, HS Code: 400122), and natural resources (coal, HS Code: 270119, and tin, HS Code: 800110). The analytical model was tested on Indonesia's leading products in 15 importing countries during the 2010-2020 period and estimated using PPML and GMM as a robustness test. The ICT variable was proxied by bandwidth capacity, which represents the quality of internet access, both in Indonesia as an exporting country and in importing countries for Indonesia's leading products. The results of the analysis indicate that the quality of internet access has a positive impact on export growth. Additionally, other control variables, such as GDP, population, RTA, language, and importers from Asia, also have a positive impact on the export growth of Indonesia's leading commodities. It can be concluded that Indonesia’s export pattern remains concentrated in Asia's partner countries, driven by economies of scale and hindered by geographical distance. This study suggests that the development of ICT is typically a long-term process, so it takes some time to experience the significant impact of ICT, especially on exports.

Keywords

AAgricultural Commodities Export ICT International Trade Mining Commodities

Article Details

References

  1. Abeliansky, A. L., & Hilbert, M. (2017). Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters? Telecommunications Policy, 41(1), 35–48.
  2. Acemoglu, D. (2007). Equilibrium Bias of Technology. Econometrica, 75(5), 1371–1409.
  3. Ahmad, N. A., Ismail, N. W., & Hook, L. S. (2011). The Role of ICT Infrastructure on Malaysian Trade. Ournal of Economics and Management, 5(1), 9.
  4. Asgari, H. (2011). An Investigation of Brain Drain from Iran to OECD Countries Based on Gravity Model. Iranian Economic Review, 15(21).
  5. Banik, B., & Roy, C. K. (2021). Effect of exchange rate uncertainty on bilateral trade performance in SAARC countries: A gravity model analysis. International Trade, Politics and Development, 5(1).
  6. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474
  7. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.
  8. Chang, H. H., & Chen Wang, I. (2008). The relationship between network structure and international channel performance: A moderating effect of E-business activity. The Service Industries Journal, 28(2).
  9. Clarke, G. R. G., & Wallsten, S. J. (2006). Has the Internet Increased Trade? Developed and Developing Country Evidence. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 465–484.
  10. Demirkan, H., Goul, M., Kauffman, R. J., & Weber, D. M. (2009). Does Distance Matter? The Influence of ICT on Bilateral Trade Flows. 24.
  11. Edquist, H., & Henrekson, M. (2017). Do R&D and ICT affect total factor productivity growth differently? Telecommunications Policy, 41(2), 106–119.
  12. Freund, C., & Weinhold, D. (2002). The Internet and International Trade in Services. American Economic Review, 92(2), 236–240.
  13. Jaruwachirathanakul, B., & Fink, D. (2005). Internet banking adoption strategies for a developing country: The case of Thailand. Internet Research, 15(3), 295–311.
  14. Lefophane, M. H., & Kalaba, M. (2021). Estimating effects of ICT intensity on productivity, employment and output in South Africa: An industry-level analysis. Information Technology for Development, 1–26.
  15. Malau, L. R. E., Ulya, N. A., Martin, E., Anjani, R., Premono, B. T., & Yulni, T. (2022). Competitiveness and Flow of Indonesian Paper Trade in The Global Market. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 23(1), 1–18.
  16. Mattes, J. (2012). Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between Spatial and Non-spatial Factors. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1085–1099.
  17. Minges, M. (2005). Is the Internet mobile? Measurements from the Asia-Pacific region. Telecommunications Policy, 29(2–3), 113–125.
  18. Moshiri, S. (2016). ICT spillovers and productivity in Canada: Provincial and industry analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(8), 801–820.
  19. Ozcan, B. (2017). Information and communications technology (ICT) and international trade: Evidence from Turkey. Eurasian Econ Rev.
  20. Prasetyo, A., Marwanti, S., & . D. (2017). The Influence of Exchange Rate on CPO Exports of Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 18(2), 159.
  21. Priede, J., & Pereira, E. T. (2013). Innovation As A Key Factor In The International Competitiveness Of The European Union. European Integration Studies, 0(7), 212–221.
  22. Rodríguez-Crespo, E., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2019). The effect of ICT on trade: Does product complexity matter? Telematics and Informatics, 41, 182–196.
  23. Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology Adoption in Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4).
  24. Sinha, M., Das, R., & Sengupta, P. P. (2020). FDI, ICT and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis. Springer Singapore.
  25. Soori, A. R., & Tashkini, A. (2012). Gravity Model: An Application to Trade between Iran and Regional Blocs. Iranian Economic Review, 15(31).
  26. Steyaert, J., & Gould, N. (2009). Social Work and the Changing Face of the Digital Divide. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 740–753.
  27. Timmis, J. (2012). The Internet and International Trade in Goods. Dicussion Paper Nottingham University, 12(3), 43.