Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 169 Download : 148

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectively, this study was conducted to examine and examine the effect of leadership style and work motivation on job satisfaction. The object of the research is a member of the Polewali Mandar Police. The population in this study were all members of the Police at Polewali Mandar Police, amounting to 497 people. The number of samples in this study was determined using the slovin formula to obtain a total sample of 83 respondents. Data was collected by distributing questionnaires. The data in this study were analyzed using the SPSS tool with several stages of testing such as validity, reliability, normality testing, and hypothesis testing consisting of simultaneous tests, coefficient of determination tests, and partial tests. Simultaneously and partially, leadership style and work motivation affect job satisfaction. Leadership style has the most dominant influence on job satisfaction for members of the Polewali Mandar Police. The results of this study suggest that the leadership style applied to police members at POLRES Polewali Mandar is more emphasized on consistent leadership in using rewards to stimulate member performance and providing punishment for personnel who violate the rules. It would be better if leadership education or official training were given to the leaders in this unit to get closer personally to members of POLRI.

Keywords

Leadership Style ; Work Motivation; Job satisfaction Work Motivation Job satisfaction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Al-Malki, M., & Juan, W. (2018). Leadership styles and job performance: A literature review. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 3(3).
  2. Al Khajeh, E. H. (2018). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2018, 1–10.
  3. Alam, S., Lawalata, I. L. D., Maricar, R., & Halim, A. (2021). Influence of Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance. Point Of View Research Management, 2(2), 123–131.
  4. Antonakis, J., House, R. J., & Simonton, D. K. (2017). Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1003.
  5. Astakoni, I. M. P. (2017). analisis model keterkaitan gayakepemimpinan, iklim organisasi, karakterristikindividu, kepuasan kerja, komitmen organisasi dan kinerja karyawanpada perusahaan daerah air minum (pdam) tirta mangutama kabupaten badung. Forum Manajemen STIMI Handayani Denpasar, 12(2), 92–102.
  6. Giltinane, C. L. (2013). Leadership styles and theories. Nursing Standard, 27(41).
  7. Hasibuan, S. M. (2018). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 1(1), 71–80.
  8. Herzberg, F. (2017). Motivation to work. Routledge.
  9. Lawler III, E. E., & Suttle, J. L. (1973). Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(3), 482–503.
  10. Lubis, Y. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Kerja Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Kebun Kelapa Sawit PT Langkat Nusantara Kepong. Universitas Medan Area.
  11. Maslow, A. H., Stephens, D. C., & Heil, G. (1998). Maslow on management. John Wiley New York.
  12. Rahim, S., Muslim, M., & Amin, A. (2019). Red Flag And Auditor Experience Toward Criminal Detection Trough Profesional Skepticism. XXIII(01), 47–62.
  13. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior.
  14. Suprijanto, A. (2011). Dampak globalisasi ekonomi terhadap perekonomian Indonesia. CIVIS, 1(2).
  15. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making (Vol. 110). University of Pittsburgh Pre.