Article Sidebar

The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style and Work Discipline on Job Performance among Maros District Education Office Employees SettingsThe Influence of Competence, Motivation, Loyalty, and Work Discipline on the Productivity of North Kalimantan Regional Police SettingsThe Effect of CSR, Intellectual Capital and GCG on Company Value with Financial Performance as a Moderating Variable in Food & Beverage Industry Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) SettingsAnalysis of Leading Sector Development in the Mamminasata Region, South Sulawesi SettingsThe Effect of Liquidity and Leverage on Firm Value Through Profitability at PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk SettingsThe Impact of Human Resources on the Rectorate of Universitas Hasanuddin Financial Performance SettingsThe Influence of Education Level, Job Satisfaction, and Compensation on the Performance of State Civil Apparatuses at the Mambi District Office SettingsThe Effect of Financial Literacy and Online Shopping on Student Consumptive Behavior SettingsThe Effect of Financial Literacy on Interest in Using Fintech Payments on the Shopee Application SettingsThe Effect of Attitude and Trust on Behavioral Intention In The Modern Market Industry SettingsThe Influence of Tenure of Service Rewards, Job Satisfaction, and Work Environment on the Performance of Regional Inspectorate Employees in Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province SettingsThe Effect of Promotion, Work Experience, and Motivation on Employee Performance at the Regional Revenue Agency, Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province SettingsThe Effect of Motivation and Work Environment on Employee Performance at PT. Pratomo Putra Teknik, City of Palopo SettingsThe Relationship between Work Motivation and Workload on Employee Job Satisfaction at PT. Pratomo Putra Teknik Palopo SettingsThe Influence of Communication Teamwork and Work Discipline on Employee Performance at PT. Pratomo Putra Teknik Palopo SettingsThe Influence of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Culture on Employee Performance at the Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) in Luwu Regency SettingsBehavior of Political Elite Taxpayers and Political Connections to Tax Obligations during the COVID-9 Pandemic SettingsThe Effect of Information Technology Perceptions and Complaint Handling on Customer Interests in Using BMM Mobile at PT. Bank Maluku Malut KC Ternate SettingsThe Influence of Compensation and Competence on Employee Performance at the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Office of Takalar Regency SettingsThe Influence of Location and Price on Shopping Decisions at Practical Gelael Makassar
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 236 Download : 168

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research focuses on the behavior of political elite taxpayers and their political connections during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research object is the political elite, entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs who have connections with the political elite in Balikpapan. Using Husserl's transdental phenomenological study to gain an in-depth understanding of the behavior and meaning of tax with tax subjects using the terms "politically elite taxpayers" and "politically connected taxpayers", as a form of perspective on the other side of exploring taxpayer behavior and the meaning of tax by adding a subject to new research other than what has been done by previous researchers (e.g., WP-OP, WP-UMKM, WP-UMK). Meanwhile, it is known that 22 of the 45 political elites in the Balikpapan city legislature have business backgrounds. Even though he later left the management of the company, unless he was still registered as a director for a certain reason along with his existing political connections, it left questions about his independence from his duties as a legislative political elite and his partiality for his business or for his group. Rent-seeking opportunities, budgeting for people's welfare projects, and the distribution of donations for handling COVID-19 are things that they see for themselves to explore compliance, the meaning of taxes, and their behavior in light of the policies that they set in their company. Tax-related policies, this research only focuses on the cost of COVID-19 donations due to indications of large tax aggressiveness and indications of the legitimacy of companies and themselves as political elites with political connections. As a result of the research, based on the reduction of deep meaning found in information from informants, there is suspicion of other political elites prioritizing personal or group interests in project planning and implementation. Political elite taxpayer informants and politically connected taxpayers chose not to follow the rules for implementing the distribution of COVID-19 assistance and chose not to take existing tax facilities to reduce the company's tax burden on humanitarian grounds, and it was difficult to prepare data according to tax rules.

Keywords

Covid-19 Contribution Tax Rent-Seeking Tax Aggressiveness Taxpayer Behavior Political Elites

Article Details

References

  1. Abbas, A., Ilham, M., Triani, N., Arizah, A., & Rayyani, W. O. (2020). Involvement of Firms in Helping Fight the Covid 19: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 8, 72–76.
  2. Adiarsa, S. R. (2022). Menimbang Perilaku Elit Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Perspektif Etika Pemerintahan. Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana, 7(1), 65–82. https://journal.unsika .ac.id/index.php/politikomindonesiana%0AMenimbang
  3. Aliyah, S. (2014). Makna Pajak Dan Implikasinya Dalam Bingkai Perspektif Wajib Pajak Umkm (Studi Interpretatif pada Wajib Pajak UMKM di Kabupaten Jepara ). Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi & Bisnis, 11(1), 81–102.
  4. Amalia, D., & Ferdiansyah, S. (2019). Do Political Connection, Executive Character, and Audit Quality Affect the Tax Avoidance Practice? Evidence in Indonesia. 377(Icaess), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaess-19.2019.5
  5. Azizah, K. (2022). Mendag Zulhas Tinjau Pasar Murah, Ada Janji dan Iming-Iming di Balik “Minyak Gratis” _ merdeka. In Medeka.com.
  6. Barid, F. M., & Wulandari, S. (2021). Praktik Penghindaran Pajak Sebelum dan Setelah Pandemi Covid – 19 di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 8(02), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.2021-.008.02.17
  7. Cahyani, L. P. G., & Noviari, N. (2019). Pengaruh Tarif Pajak, Pemahaman Perpajakan, dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 26, 1885. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019-.v26.i03.p08
  8. Charities Aid Foundation. (2021). World Giving (Issue June). www.cafonline.org
  9. Civera, C., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). Stakeholder Relationships and Responsibilities: A New Perspective. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 40–58. https://doi.org /10.4468/2019.1.04civera.freeman
  10. Darmayasa, I. N., & Aneswari, Y. R. (2015). The Ethical Practice of Tax Consultant Based on Local Culture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015-.11.021
  11. DDTCNews, R. (2022). Mau Tahu Hasil Pelaksanaan PPS 2022? Simak Data dari Ditjen Pajak Ini. News.Ddtc.Co.Id.
  12. Debasa, A. M. C. (2017). The Use of Charity as a Means of Political Legitimation in Umayyad al-Andalus. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 60(3), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341425
  13. Dewi1, A. A. I. P., Sudarma2, M., & Baridwan3, Z. (2019). Mengupas Bentuk Dilema Dari Sisi Konsultan Pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis (JIAB) (Online), 14(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2019.v14.i01.p12
  14. Diller, M., Asen, M., & Späth, T. (2020). The effects of personality traits on digital transformation: Evidence from German tax consulting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 37(xxxx), 100455. https://doi.org-/10.1016/j.accinf.2020.100455
  15. DJP. (2020). Konsisten Mengoptimalkan Peluang di Masa Menantang: Laporan Tahunan DJP.
  16. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values And Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Journal Review, 18, 122–136.
  17. Fajri, A., & Rusydi, K. (2019). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2016-2017). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya (Online), 1–18.
  18. Fionasari, D., Savitri, E., & Andreas, A. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Agresivitas Pajak (Studi pada Perusahaan yang Listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Sorot, 12(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.31258/sorot.12.2.4557
  19. Fu, J., Shimamoto, D., & Todo, Y. (2017). Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.08.003
  20. Getah, C., June, T., Akuntansi, P. M., Fakultas, P., Dan, E., & Brawijaya, U. (2018). Menggali makna kepatuhan wajib pajak usaha mikro tesis.
  21. Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2021). Harmful Stakeholder Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04310-9
  22. Hendrik, J., Kovermann, J., & Velte, P. (2021). CSR and Tax Avoidance: A Review of Empirical Reserch. Corporate Ownership & Control (Online), 18 (2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i2art2
  23. Hunt, N. C., & Iyer, G. S. (2018). The effect of tax position and personal norms: An analysis of taxpayer compliance decisions using paper and software. Advances in Accounting, 41(February), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016-/j.adiac.2018.02.003
  24. Iqbal, M. (2019). Makin Banyak Pengusaha Rangkap Jadi Politisi, Berbahayakah? In Cnbcindonesia.Com (online). https://www.cnbcindonesia .com/news/20191007140241-4-104956
  25. Irawati, W., Zimah, S., Barli, H., & Nadi, L. (2021). Understanding of Tax & Religiosity to Tax Fraud. Atlantis Press SARL, 584(Icorsh 2020), 150–166.
  26. Jessica dan Agus Arianto Toly. (2015). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibilty Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting (Online), 4(1), 222.
  27. June, C. G. T., Ludigdo, U., & Purwanti, L. (2019). Menggali Makna KepatuhanWajib Pajak Usaha Mikro. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 5(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.26905/ap.v5i1.2810
  28. Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2022). Apbn kita Mei 2022. Kementerian Keuangan RI, 1–84. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/17876/apbn-kita-mei-2021.pdf
  29. Khlif, H., & Amara, I. (2019). Political connections, corruption and tax evasion: a cross-country investigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0004
  30. Khoirunnisa Asadanie, N., & Venusita, L. (2020). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Inventory: Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.25273/inventory.v4i1.6296
  31. Kim, C. F., & Zhang, L. (2016). Corporate political connections and tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33, 78–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12150
  32. Klaudia, S., Riwayanti, D. R., & Aminatunnisa. (2009). MEnggali Realitas Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Pemilik UMKM. Jurnal PETA, 2(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51289/peta.v2i1.202
  33. Krisyadi, R., & Anita, A. (2022). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, Kepemilikan Keluarga, dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Owner, 6(1), 416–425. https://doi.org /10.33395/owner.v6i1.599
  34. Kusumawardani, I., & Sudana, I. P. (2017). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan CSR. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana ( Unud ), Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(1), hal. 741-770.
  35. Nkundabanyanga, D. M. and S. K., Muhwezi, M., Akankuda, B., & Nalukenge, I. (2017). Tax compliance of small and medium enterprises: a developing country perspective. Journal of Education, 53(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-08-2016-0065
  36. Nugroho, K. (2022). Elektabilitas Partai Politik - Kompas. In Kompas (Online) (p. 7). https://www.kompas.id/baca/artikel-opini/2022/04/11/elektabilitas-partai-politik
  37. Pranoto, B. A., Ari, D., & Widagdo, K. (2016). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik Dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Tax Aggressiveness. Paper Presented at the Seminar Nasional Dan The 3rd Call for Syariah Paper, 2012, 472–486.
  38. Ratmono.D. Winarti. M.S. (2015). Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Sarana Legitimasi: Dampaknya Terhadap Tingkat Agresivitas Pajak. Jurnal Nominal (Online), IV, 16–30.
  39. Ratmono.D. Winarti. M.S., Dowling, J., & Pfeffer. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values And Organizational Behavior. Jurnal Nominal (Online), 18, 122–136.
  40. Riskiyadi, M., Tarjo, & Anggono, A. (2020). Dilemma between Fraud and Tax Compliance at Government Agencies. International Colloquium Forensics Accounting and Governance (ICFAG), 1(1), 13–20. https://conference .trunojoyo.ac.id/pub
  41. Savitri, E., & Musfialdy. (2016). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness, Tax Socialization, Tax Penalties, Compliance Cost at Taxpayer Compliance with Service Quality as Mediating Variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.051
  42. Sentanu, I. N. W., & Budiartha, K. (2019). Effect of taxation modernization on tax compliance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(4), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n4.683
  43. Tene, J. H., Sondakh, J. J., & Warongan, J. D. (2017). Pengaruh Pemahaman Wajib Pajak, Kesadaran Pajak, Sanksi Perpajakan dan Pelayanan Fiskus Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi Empiris Pada Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi yang Terdaftar di KPP Pratama Manado). Jurnal EMBA, ISSN 2303-1174 (Online), 5(2), 443–453.
  44. Utama, M. S., Nimran, U., Hidayat, K., & Prasetya, A. (2022). Effect of Religiosity, Perceived Risk, and Attitude on Tax Compliant Intention Moderated by e-Filing. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijfs10010008
  45. Utamaningsi, L. (2020). Perusahaan Keluarga, Koneksi Politik & Kinerja Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i1.840
  46. Wahyuni, M. A., Julianto, I. P., & Dewi, N. W. Y. (2019). The Examination of Tax Evasion Behavior of Tax Payers from The Perspective of Planned Behavior Theory. 69(Teams 2018), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.2991/teams-18.2019.9
  47. Wicaksono, A. P. N. (2017). Koneksi Politik dan Aggresivitas Pajak: Fenomena di Indonesia. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi (Online), 10 (I)(April), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v10i1.5833
  48. Zhang, J., Marquis, C., & Qiao, K. (2016). Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organization Science, 27(5), 1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1084
  49. Zhang, Y. (2021). Corporate Responses to COVID-19: A Nonmarket Strategy Approach. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 1032–1057. https://doi.org /10.1177/07311214211017587 ----
  50. Adi, Priyo Hari. 2018. “Rent-Seeking Behaviore in Local Government.”
  51. Andrias, Mohammad Ali. 2019. “Oligarki Dan Praktik Rent Seeking Pasca Pemekaran Tasikmalaya.” JIPP 05(01):43–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.37058/jipp.v5i1.2017.
  52. Kamayanti, Ari. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian: Kualitatif Akuntansi - Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. Cetakan ke. edited by A. D. Mulawarman. Jakarta Selatan: Yayasan Rumah Peneleh.
  53. Moore, Don A., and Derek Schatz. 2017. “The Three Faces of Overconfidence.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 11(8):1–12. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12331.
  54. Mulawarman, A. Dedi. 2022. Memeriksai ’Alam Kebenaran: Sebuah Mahakarya Makrifat Yang “Terlupakan.” Cetakan ke. edited by A. Kamayanti. Malang, Indonesia: Penerbit Peneleh.
  55. Murray, Cameron K. 2012. “Markets in Political Influence: Rent-Seeking, Networks and Groups.” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (42070).
  56. Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin. 2018. “Konstruksi Kebijakan Anggaran: Aksentuasi Drama Politik Dan Kekuasaan (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Jembrana Bali).” EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan) 15(3):307–31. doi: 10.24034/j25485024.y2011.v15.i3.371.
  57. Taylor, Steven. 2019. “The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 18:581–609. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-020131. ---
  58. Agung, I. M. (2020). Memahami Pandemi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Psikologi Sosial. Psikobuletin: Buletin Ilmiah Psikologi, 1(2), 68. https://doi.org /10.24014/pib.v1i2-.9616
  59. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s105- 51-011-0761-9
  60. Anderson, B. R. O. (2006). Langguage and Power: Exploring Political Cultures In Indonesia (I). Equinox Publishing.
  61. Archie B. Carroll. (1999). Evolution of a Definitional Construct of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
  62. Azhar, M. A. (2012). Relasi Pengusaha-Penguasa dalam Demokrasi: Fenomeda Rent Seeker Pengusaha jada Penguasa. 2(1), 43–55.
  63. Barid, B., & Mulyanto, D. (2018). Pendanaan Partai Politik di Indonesia : Mencari Pola Pendanaan Ideal untuk Mencegah Korupsi. Integritas, 4, 265–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i1.248
  64. BBC News Indonesia. (2020). “Cuma flu biasa”: Pernyataan-pernyataan kontroversial seputar virus corona dari para pemimpin dunia. BBC News Indonesia, 1–14. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-52181181
  65. Bieber, F. (2022). Global Nationalism in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
  66. Nationalities Papers, 50(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.35
  67. Bown, C. P., & Bollyky, T. J. (2022). How COVID-19 vaccine supply chains emerged in the midst of a pandemic. World Economy, 45(2), 468–522. https://doi.org/10 .1111/twec.13183
  68. Budiardjo, M. (2013). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik (E. R. C. Ke-6 (ed.); Revisi: Ce). PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  69. Bustomi, H. (2022). Kegiatan Filantropi Di Masa Pandemi: Peran Satgas Dalam Menanggulangi Dampak Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Muslim Heritage2, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v7i1.3551
  70. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(January 1979), 479–505. https: //doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  71. Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006-.11.003
  72. CNN Indonesia. (2020). Mendag Larang Ekspor Masker dan APD di Masa Darurat Corona. CNN Indonesia, 1–6.
  73. De, I., Chattopadhyay, S., Nathan, H. S. K., & Sarkar, K. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic, Public Policy, and Institutions in India: Issues of Labour, Income, and Human Development. In COVID-19 Pandemic, Public Policy, and Institutions in India (1 st). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781- 003226970
  74. Departemen kementerian Hukum dan Has Asasi Manuasia. (2007). Undang- Undang Reprublik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Issue 1).
  75. Erdmann, G., & Engel, U. (2011). Neopatrimonialism Revisited: Beyond a Catch- All Concept. SSRN Electronic Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.- 909183
  76. Eryadini, T. S. (2013). CSR Dalam Bingkai Neoliberalisme: Studi Kasus Perusahaan JOB-PPEJ Di Desa Campurejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Politik Muda, 2(1), 1–14. http://journal.unair.ac.id/JPM
  77. Estes, R. (2005). Tyranny Of The Bottom Line: Mengapa Banyak Perusahaan Membuat Orang Baik Bertindak Buruk. In PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama (Terjemahan). PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  78. Faizi, L. (2022). 4 Negara yang Tidak Terkena Virus Corona, Kok Bisa? SindoNews.Com, 1–6. https://www.sindonews.com/%224 Negara yang Tidak Terkena Virus Corona; Kok Bisa?
  79. Fischer, P. V. (2006). Rent-Seeking Institutions And Reforms In Africa: Theory and Empirical Evidence for Tanzania (pp. 1–654). Springer Verlag.
  80. Friedman, T. L. (2020). Our New Historical Divide: B.C. and A.C. the World Before Corona and the World After. The New York Times, online. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/opinion/coronavirus-trends.html
  81. Fu, J., Shimamoto, D., & Todo, Y. (2017). Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.- asieco.2017.08.003
  82. Grafton, R. Q., & Williams, J. (2020). Rent-seeking behaviour and regulatory capture in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 36(2–3), 484–504.https://doi.org/10.1080/07900-627.2019.1674132
  83. Harsawaskita, A. (2020). Mengkaji Kemungkinan Dunia Pasca-Pagebluk 2020: Deglobalisasi Dan Kembalinya Big State. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 0(0), 9–21.
  84. Harvey, J. H., & Weary, G. (1984). Current Issues in Attribution Theory and Research. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 427–459.https://doi.org /10.1146/annurev-.ps.35.020184.002235
  85. Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2021). Potensi Rent-Seeking dan Indikasi Konflik Kepentingan dalam Distribusi Ivermectin Indonesia Corruption Watch Potensi Rent-Seeking dan Indikasi Konflik Kepentingan. Indonesia Corruption Watch. https://icw.or.id/RFx
  86. Ip, S., & Yusuf, P. C. (2021). Siapa Untung Siapa Buntung (Kajian Ekonomi Politik Covid-19 Di Indonesia). Prosiding Senaspolhi3, Vol 1, No, 1–17.
  87. Kerr, J., Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 179(September 2020), 110892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.-2021.110892
  88. Kh, M. (2020). Respon Kebijakan Pemulihan Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. SindoNews.Com, 22–26. https://daerah.sindonews.com/read/72594/704/- respon-kebijakan-pemulihan-ekonomi-pasca-pandemi-covid-19-1592381161
  89. Khlif, H., & Amara, I. (2019). Political connections, corruption and tax evasion: a cross-country investigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0004
  90. Krastev, I. (2020). Seven early lessons from the coronavirus. European Council onForeign Relations, 1–4. http://www.afaemme.org/sites/default/files/com-mentary _seven_early_lessons_from_the_coronavirus.pdf
  91. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. The American Economic Association, 64(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059494
  92. Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco-.2007.03.001
  93. LoI Indonesia - IMF. (1998). Letter Of Intent - Memorandum Kebijakan Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 15 Januari 1998. In IMF.
  94. McGee, R. W. (2006). Three views on the ethics of tax evasion. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9002-z
  95. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The Trouble With Overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
  96. Moore, D. A., & Schatz, D. (2017). The three faces of overconfidence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111-/spc3.12331
  97. Mulawarman, A. D. (2022). 2024: Hijrah Untuk Negeri, Kehancuran atau Kebangkitan. Indonesia Dalam Ayunan Peradaban (Ari Kamayanti (ed.); Cetakan ke). Peneleh.
  98. Murray, C. K. (2012). Markets in political influence: rent-seeking, networks and groups. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 42070.
  99. Newman, D. B., Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2022). Contrasting Effects of Finding Meaning and Searching for Meaning, and Political Orientation and Religiosity, on Feelings and Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(6), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616-72211030383
  100. Nur Hakim, R. (2020). Kilas Balik 6 Bulan Covid-19: Pernyataan Kontroversial Pejabat soal Virus Corona. Kompas.Com, 1. Parry, G. (2005). Political Elites. ECPR Press.
  101. Pinanjaya, O., & Giri S, W. (2012). Muslihat Kapitalis Global.
  102. Rachbini, D. J., & Abdulah, R. (2020). Musuh Bangsa Bernama Kesenjangan Sosial. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=QFH5DwAAQBAJ
  103. Raymond Fisman. (2001). Estimating the Value of Political Connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/-10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
  104. Sabahelzain, M. M., Hartigan-Go, K., & Larson, H. J. (2021). The politics of Covid-19 vaccine confidence. Current Opinion in Immunology, 71, 92–96. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coi.2021.06.007
  105. Samsuddin, H., Gunawan, C. I., & Sasmito, C. (2019). Membongkar Relasi Kekuasaan Oligarki di Kota Batu : Studi Kasus Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Dalam Pemberian Keringanan Pajak dan Korupsi Kebijakan PT BWR. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 16(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v16i2.511
  106. Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/41162149
  107. Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21(23), R941–R945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030
  108. Sitorus, A. A. (2021). Disinkronisasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Penanganan Covid-19. Jurnal Renaissance, 6(1), 721. https://doi.org-/10.53878/jr.v6i1.137
  109. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.-5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  110. Tatang Guritno, D. M. (2021). Terdakwa Korupsi Bansos Covid-19 Matheus Joko Divonis 9 Tahun Penjara. Nasional.Kompas.Com, 1–8. https://nasional.- kompas.com/read/2021/09 /01/23065841/terdakwa-korupsi-bansos-covid-19- matheus-joko-divonis-9-tahun-penjara
  111. Taylor, S. (2019). The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18, 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-020131
  112. Tullock, G. (2003). The Origin Rent-Seeking Concept. International Journal of Business and Economics, 2(1), 1–8.
  113. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (C. Roth, Guenther; Wittich (ed.); Volume 2). University of California Press.
  114. Zakaria, F. (2021). Sepuluh Pelajaran Untuk Dunia Pasca-Pandemi: Penanganan Menghadapi Perubahan Dunia Akibat Covid-19 (Terjemahan). PT Pustaka Alvabet.
  115. Zuckerman, A. (1977). The Consept “Political Elite”: Lesson from Mosca and Pareto. The Journal of Politics, 30 No. 2, 324–344. http://www.jstor.org-/stable/2130054
  116. Kamayanti, A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi. Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. Cetakan pertama, Jakarta Selatan: Yayasan Rumah Peneleh
  117. Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE Publicatiom Inc. Thousand Oaks: California.
  118. Moleong, L. J. (2005). Metodolgi penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. PT Remaja Rodaskarya: Bandung
  119. Burrel, G & Morgan. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organitational Analysis.
  120. Ashgate Publhising Company: USA
  121. Kuswarno, Engkus. 2013. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran
  122. Sukandarrumidi, Metodologi Penelitian Petunjuk Praktis Untuk Peneliti pemula, Gajah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta,2006,h44
  123. Aliyah, S. (2014). Makna Pajak Dalam Bingkai Perspektif Wajib Pajak UMKM (Studi Interpretatif pada Wajib Pajak UMKM di Kabupaten Jepara ). Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi & Bisnis, 11(1), 81–102.
  124. Burrel, G., & Gareth, M. (2016). Burrel - Sociological Paradigmsand Organitational Analysis.pdf. Routledge.
  125. Farid, M. (2018). Fenomenologi: Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Sosial (pp. 1–186).
  126. Fu, J., Shimamoto, D., & Todo, Y. (2017). Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45–55. https:/ /doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.08.003
  127. Hasbiansyah, O. (2008). Phenomenological Approaches: Introduction to Research Practices in Social and Communication Sciences [Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi]. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(1), 163–180.
  128. Iqbal, M. (2019). Makin Banyak Pengusaha Rangkap Jadi Politisi, Berbahayakah? In Cnbcindonesia.Com (online). https://www.cnbcindonesia. com/news/20191007140241-4-104956
  129. Kamayanti, A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi, Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan (C. Pertama (ed.)). Yayasan Rumah Peneleh.
  130. Kerlinger, F. N. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Harcourt College Publishers Asli.
  131. Kim, C. F., & Kim, C. F. (2016). Pengetahuan Kelembagaan di Singapore Management University Koneksi politik perusahaan dan agresivitas pajak Hubungan Politik Perusahaan dan Agresivitas Pajak. 78–114.
  132. Moleong, L. J. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  133. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Method. Sage Publications, Inc.
  134. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative Research. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 3, 1633–1636. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192. bsa514
  135. Pradnyarani Dewi, A. A. I., & Mitrawan, D. T. (2020). Studi Fenomenologi: Makna Ketidakpatuhan Wajib Pajak Importir. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 12(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.12.1.1426.84-94
  136. Sanders, P. (1982). A New Way of Viewing Phenomenology. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/doi:10.5465/amr.1982. 4285315
  137. Sukandarrumidi. (2006). Sukandarrumidi. Metodologi Penelitian: Petunjuk Praktis Untuk Peneliti Semula. Pers Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  138. Syahputra, E. (2022). Pengadaan Gorden Rumah Dinas Rp 43 ,5M, Ini Penjelasan DPR. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com /news/20220510091735-4-337667/pengadaan-gorden-rumah-dinas-rp-435-m-ini-penjelasan-dpr.