Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 268 Download : 228

Main Article Content

Abstract

High-quality audits are essential for fostering transparency and accountability in public financial management, ultimately enhancing public trust. This study examines the effects of accountability, transparency, and moral reasoning on audit quality at the Inspectorate of West Sulawesi Province. Data were collected from 50 auditors with an 80% response rate using a quantitative approach and survey method. The results reveal that accountability and transparency significantly influence audit quality, while moral reasoning shows no significant effect. These findings align with agency theory, highlighting the role of transparency and accountability in reducing information asymmetry. The study emphasizes the need for policies that strengthen accountability and transparency in public sector audits. The results provide practical implications for improving audit quality and serve as a foundation for future research with broader scope and additional variables.

Keywords

Accountability Transparency Moral Reasoning Audit Quality

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hanif AR, M. A., Nirwana, N., & Darmawati, D. (2024). The Influence of Accountability, Transparency, and Moral Reasoning on the Audit Quality of the Inspectorate of West Sulawesi Province. Paradoks : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v8i1.1014
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agustiawan, Yusoff, M. N. H., & Abdullah, T. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Internal Audit Quality of Public Sector Organizations (pp. 299–312). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_24
  2. Andri, M., Putra, R. C., Saputra, K. R., & Gunawan, S. Y. (2020). Audit Quality Perspectives in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi & Keuangan, 8(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v8i2.24341
  3. Apdaresena, N. R. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi Moral Reasoning, Due Profesional Care, Integritas Auditor, dan Skeptisme Profesional Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Yogyakarta ).
  4. Ardianto, C. N. (2023). Nilai Perusahaan: Pengaruh Profitabilitas dan Good Corporate Governance. 7(2), 1087–1106.
  5. Asqolani, A., Hidayat, R. T., Marsono, M., & Kalpikotomo, B. (2023). Internal Control in the Public Sector in Indonesia: a Case Study of State Tax Receivables Management. Ultimaccounting Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 15(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v15i2.3360
  6. Azizah, D. N., & Kholifah R, E. (2023). Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas dan Responsivitas dalam Pengelolaan APBDes terhadap Kepercayaan Publik. Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v1i2.117
  7. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK-RI). (2019). Daftar Rekapitulasi Hasil Pemantauan Tindak Lanjut Rekomendasi Hasil Pemeriksaan pada Pemerintah Daerah IHPS I 2019. 2023, 1–152.
  8. Benito-Esteban, C. I., Elvira-Lorilla, T., Garcia-Rodriguez, I., & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2024). The Complex Relationship between the Board and Web Transparency in Nonprofit Organizations. Voluntas, 35(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00566-y
  9. BPK-RI/5/26/2008, Dh.-B. (2003). UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2003. 1, 1–40.
  10. BUTARBUTAR, T. E., KALANGI, L., & GAMALIEL, H. (2020). Pengaruh Motivasi, Dukungan Manajemen dan Integritas terhadap Kualitas Audit Internal Aparat Inspektorat dalam Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Inspektorat Kota Manado). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing “Goodwill,” 11(1). https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v11i1.28192
  11. Faizal, M. (2019). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor Dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Tekanan Klien Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 4(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v4i3.287
  12. Falatah, H. F., & Sukirno, S. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Moral Reasoning terhdap Kualitas Audit (Studi Pada Kantor Inspektorat Daerah Di Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Nominal, Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v7i1.19361
  13. Genisa, N. P., & Hisar Pangaribuan. (2023). Pengaruh Kompleksitas Audit, Due Professional Care Dan Transparansi Terhadap Kualitas Audit. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi), 9(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v9i2.1034
  14. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (Edisi 8) (Edisi 8).
  15. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101497
  16. Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Herkes, F., Leistikow, I., Verkroost, J., de Vries, F., & Zijlstra, W. G. (2021). Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies? Evidence from a representative survey experiment. Regulation and Governance, 15(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12278
  17. Guerriero, C. (2011). Accountability in government and regulatory policies: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.07.001
  18. Husni, M. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat denagn Peran Kinerja Pemerintah.
  19. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0. (2023). IBM Corp.
  20. Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Mamuju. (n.d.). LAKIP INSPEKTORAT 2023.
  21. Inspektorat, P., Daerah, S., Provinsi, I. D., Daerah, F. I., Daerah, I., Nomor, P. P., Daerah, P., Nomor, P. P., Daerah, P., Ri, B. P. K., Provinsi, P., Tenggara, N., & Halaman, B. (2019). Penguatan Inspektorat Provinsi / Kabupatn / Kota Dalam Hal Pemeriksaan / Audit Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 72 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2016. 1–12.
  22. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
  23. Kim, W. (2023). Corporate governance: Upholding transparency, accountability, and ethical standards. Business Studies Journal, 15(4), 1–3.
  24. King, H. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Audit Quality on Accountability and Transparency among Financial Institutions in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(2), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4130
  25. Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral Development: A Review of the Theory. Theory Into Practice, 16(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847709542675
  26. Natsir, M., Rahmawaty, S., Zahra, F., Mile, Y., & Hatimah, H. (2023). Pengaruh Independensi, Transparansi, Dan Pengalaman Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Manado (JAIM), 4(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.53682/jaim.vi.5869
  27. Rabihah, A., Zakaria, A., & Nasution, H. (2023). Pengaruh akuntabilitas , tekanan anggaran waktu , dan moral reasoning terhadap kualitas audit. Fair Value : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(12), 1–8.
  28. Resmy, R., Kitta, S., & Sylvia. (2023). Pengaruh Independensi, Etika Dan Standar Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Inspektorat Sulawesi Barat. Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, 2(3), 259–271.
  29. Ruslan, F., Wawo, A., & Aditiya, R. (2022). Pengaruh Whistleblowing System Dan Moral Reasoning Dalam Pengungkap Fraud Keuangan dengan Pemahaman Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Mungkar Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. ISAFIR: Islamic Accounting and Finance Review, 3(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.24252/isafir.v3i1.29793
  30. Selviyana, F. (2017). Pengaruh Persepsi Karyawan Mengenai Whistleblowing System Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud dengan perilaku Etis Sebagai Variabel Intervening. 1. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=2227%0A???%0Ahttps://ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/kajian_akuntansi/article/view/3307%0Ahttp://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcs/portugues/2018/v3103/pdf/3103009.pdf%0Ahttp://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.ph
  31. Srimindarti, C., Ashobah, S. N. F., Hardiningsih, P., & Yunianto, A. (2022). Does Moral Reasoning Moderate Audit Quality Determinants? International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 14(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v14i2.693
  32. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
  33. Syamsuriana, N. (2019). Dampak Perilaku Altruisme, Moral Reasoning dan Kecerdasan Emosional Terhadap Kualitas Audit. ATESTASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v2i2.275
  34. Tawiah, V. (2023). The Effect of IPSAS Adoption on Governance Quality: Evidence from Developing and Developed Countries. Public Organization Review, 23(1), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00625-w
  35. Thalib, H., Sylvia, & Kitta, S. (2023). Pengaruh integritas, independesi dan objektivitas terhadap kualitas hasil audit pada inspektorat provinsi sulawesi barat. 2, 404–418.
  36. Zubaidah, A. N., & Nugraeni, N. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Slemen. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 7(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v7i3.3475