Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 172 Download : 141

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the role of social accounting in addressing income inequality and managing environmental impacts, highlighting its adaptability across diverse socio-economic contexts and its contribution to corporate social responsibility (CSR). Utilizing a systematic literature review, this study synthesizes insights from recent research to explore how flexible social accounting frameworks align with different regulatory and socio-economic environments. It assesses both theoretical foundations and practical applications. Legitimacy theory serves as a conceptual basis, framing social accounting as a tool for building public trust and enhancing corporate accountability. The findings suggest that social accounting effectively promotes economic and environmental transparency. Social accounting fosters greater public trust and aligns corporate actions with societal expectations by enabling companies to record and report wage distribution, employment practices, and environmental metrics. The study also underscores the importance of flexible social accounting frameworks that allow companies to adapt to local socio-economic conditions, especially in regions with resource constraints or unique regulatory environments. This study advances the understanding of social accounting’s dual role as a reporting and strategic tool for sustainable development. Practically, it suggests that companies adopting adaptable social accounting frameworks can improve stakeholder relations, build credibility, and support long-term sustainability goals. These findings are relevant for corporate managers, policymakers, and future researchers interested in the impact of socially responsible practices on corporate reputation and public trust.

Keywords

Social Accounting Income Inequality Environmental Impact Corporate Social Responsibility Legitimacy Theory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tahir, A., Lande, A., Ermawati, Y., Basannang, S. M., & Junaedy, J. (2025). Analysis of the Role of Social Accounting in Addressing Income Inequality and Environmental Influences. Paradoks : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v8i1.1078
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2022). Accounting and sustainability: an introduction. In Handbook of accounting and sustainability (pp. 1–8). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800373518.00006
  2. Adams, C. A., Potter, B., Singh, P. J., & York, J. (2016). Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review, 48(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.05.002
  3. Andersson, F. N. G. (2024). Economic inequality and the ecological footprint: Time-varying estimates for four developed economies, 1962–2021. Ecological Economics, 220, 108185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108185
  4. Baker, M., Gray, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2023). Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 591–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2022-5773
  5. Bart Aswain, I. E., Ahmad Ludin, N., Jarimi, H., Purvis-Robert, K. L., Hamid, N. H., Mohd Shariff, M. Z., & Burke, J. (2024). Harmonizing business practices of events and convention industry through sustainability assessment framework development. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 15, 100226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2024.100226
  6. Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., O’Dwyer, B., & Thomson, I. (2021). Routledge handbook of environmental accounting. Routledge London.
  7. Bowen, K. J., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Koch, F., Patterson, J., Häyhä, T., Vogt, J., & Barbi, F. (2017). Implementing the “Sustainable Development Goals”: towards addressing three key governance challenges—collective action, trade-offs, and accountability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 90–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.002
  8. Brown, L. D. (2008). Creating credibility: Legitimacy and accountability for transnational civil society. Kumarian Press.
  9. Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability, social responsibility and environmental management. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46849-5
  10. Castelo Branco, M. C., Gomes, D., & Martins, A. (2024). An institutionalist political-economy perspective on social and environmental accounting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(5), 1641–1661. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2023-2248
  11. Cerciello, M., Busato, F., & Taddeo, S. (2023). The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 802–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2389
  12. Chancel, L. (2020). Towards distributional national and environmental accounts. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 36(3), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-200689
  13. Chelli, M., Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2019). Substantive and symbolic strategies sustaining the environmentally friendly ideology. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3343
  14. Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(2), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606
  15. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2019). Adoption of CSR and sustainability reporting standards: Economic analysis and review (Vol. 623). National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA, USA.
  16. Chu, L. K., & Hoang, D. P. (2023). The interaction of income inequality and urbanization in affecting environmental quality: International evidence. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 30(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2224749
  17. Chung, J., & Cho, C. H. (2018). Current trends within social and environmental accounting research: A literature review. Accounting Perspectives, 17(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12171
  18. Clune, C., & O’Dwyer, B. (2020). Framing Engagement that Resonates: Organizing Advocacy for Corporate Social and Environmental Accountability. European Accounting Review, 29(5), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1746374
  19. de Villiers, C., & Sharma, U. (2020). A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 70, 101999. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.05.003
  20. Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
  21. Dong, Y., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2017). Indicators for Environmental Sustainability. Procedia CIRP, 61, 697–702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.173
  22. Ehigiamusoe, K. U., Majeed, M. T., & Dogan, E. (2022). The nexus between poverty, inequality and environmental pollution: evidence across different income groups of countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130863
  23. Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773
  24. Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872
  25. Gray, R. (2019). Towards an ecological accounting: Tensions and possibilities in social and environmental accounting. Intrinsic Capability, 53–69.
  26. Huang, X. ‘“Beryl,”’ & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001
  27. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
  28. Keuning, S. J. (1996). Accounting for economic development and social change. IOS Press.
  29. Kopp, T., & Nabernegg, M. (2022). Inequality and Environmental Impact – Can the Two Be Reduced Jointly? Ecological Economics, 201, 107589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107589
  30. La Torre, M., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Dumay, J. (2019). Integrated Reporting and Integrating Thinking: Practical Challenges BT - Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business: Reporting, Taxation, Ethics and Governance (S. Arvidsson (ed.); pp. 25–54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_2
  31. La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., & Dumay, J. (2020). Rebuilding trust: sustainability and non-financial reporting and the European Union regulation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(5), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2020-0914
  32. Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D., Giné-Garriga, R., Orlovic Lovren, V., & Willats, J. (2019). Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674
  33. Martínez‐Ferrero, J., & García‐Sánchez, I. (2017). Sustainability assurance and cost of capital: Does assurance impact on credibility of corporate social responsibility information? Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12152
  34. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
  35. Paehlke, R. (2003). Democracy’s dilemma: environment, social equity, and the global economy. MIT Press.
  36. Parris, D. L., Dapko, J. L., Arnold, R. W., & Arnold, D. (2016). Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management. Management Decision, 54(1), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0279
  37. Pata, U. K., Yilanci, V., Hussain, B., & Naqvi, S. A. A. (2022). Analyzing the role of income inequality and political stability in environmental degradation: evidence from South Asia. Gondwana Research, 107, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.02.009
  38. Peifer, J. L., & Newman, D. T. (2020). Making the business case for corporate social responsibility and perceived trustworthiness: A cross‐stakeholder analysis. Business and Society Review, 125(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12210
  39. Qian, W., Tilt, C., & Belal, A. (2021). Social and environmental accounting in developing countries: contextual challenges and insights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1021–1050. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2021-5172
  40. Rodrigues, M., do Céu Alves, M., Oliveira, C., Vale, V., Vale, J., & Silva, R. (2021). Dissemination of social accounting information: A bibliometric review. Economies, 9(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010041
  41. Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722882
  42. Soltani, M., Moradi Kashkooli, F., Souri, M., Rafiei, B., Jabarifar, M., Gharali, K., & Nathwani, J. S. (2021). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 140, 110750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750
  43. Stubbs, W., Higgins, C., & Higgins, C. (2018). Stakeholders ’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2954-0
  44. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  45. Tiwari, K., & Khan, M. S. (2020). Sustainability accounting and reporting in the industry 4.0. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120783. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120783
  46. Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
  47. Ullah, A., & Ali, A. (2024). Investigating Corruption, Income Inequality, and Environmental Degradation in Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options , 7(1 SE-Articles), 9–18. http://resdojournals.com/index.php/JEEPO/article/view/344
  48. Wang, J. (2024). Renewable energy, inequality and environmental degradation. Journal of Environmental Management, 356, 120563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120563
  49. Zighan, S., Dwaikat, N. Y., Alkalha, Z., & Abualqumboz, M. (2024). Knowledge management for supply chain resilience in pharmaceutical industry: evidence from the Middle East region. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 35(4), 1142–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2022-0215