Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 509 Download : 341

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami pengaruh quality of work-life dan organizational citizenship behavior terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Alfa Retailindo di Kota Makassar. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan metode survei kuesioner yang dilakukan pada 84 orang karyawan PT. Alfa Retailindo. Pengujian hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi linear berganda menggunakan Software Statistik SPSS 26. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) quality of worklife memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan, dan (2) organizational citizenship behavior juga memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan. Kedua variabel quality of work-life dan organizational citizenship behavior dapat digunakan untuk meningkatkankinerja karyawan pada PT. Alfa Retailindo.

Keywords

Quality of Work-Life Organizational Citizenship Behavior Kinerja Karyawan

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Bima, M. I. M., Basalamah, S., Zakaria, J., & Nurpadila, N. (2022). Pengaruh Quality Of Work-Life dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT. Alfa Retailindo. Paradoks : Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 5(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v5i1.138
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Azmi, A. (2010). The Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and High Performance Organization. Case Study at Padiberas Nasional Berhad, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  2. Bachrach, D.G., Powell, B.C. and Bendoly, E. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 193-201.
  3. Cascio, W. F. (2003). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  4. Cascio, W. F. (2006). Managing Human Resources. Productivity, Quality of Wok Life, Profits. Colorado: Mc Graw–Hill.
  5. Kilinc, E. dan Ulusoy, H. (2014). Investigation of OCB, organizational silence, and employee performance at physicians and nurses, and the relationship among them. Business Management Dynamics, Vol. 74, pp. 376-382.
  6. Leitão J., Pereira D., dan Gonçalves A. (2019). Quality of Work Life and Organizational Performance: Workers’ Feelings of Contributing, or Not, to the Organization’s Productivity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(20): 3803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203803.
  7. Luthans, F. (2011). International Management Culture Strategy and Behavior. McGraw Hill Book, New York, NY.
  8. Organ, D. W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10: 85–97.
  9. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B. dan Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 513-563.
  10. Pratiwi, I. (2019). The Quality Of Work Life (QWL) as A Determining Factor for Employee Performance of LPP TVRI South Sulawesi Through Organizational Citizenshipbehavior Variables (OCB). International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology Vol. 4 Issue. 11.
  11. Singh, A. (2022). The mediating role of employee commitment between quality of work-life and job performance of the faculty. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-08-2020-0098
  12. Suumenda, B. dan Arup, V. (2007). Psychological climate and indivdual performance in India: test of a mediated model employee relations. Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 664-676.
  13. Thakur dan Sharma (2019). A Study of Impact of Quality of Work Life on Work Performance. Management and Labour Studies 44(3):326-344. DOI:10.1177/0258042X19851912
  14. Walton, Richard E. (1974), Improving the quality of work life. Harvard Business Review 52(3).